HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winfield, K. A. Articles by Martin, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Winfield, K. A. Articles by Martin, P. M. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Winfield, K. A. Articles by Martin, P. M. Related Collections Water Retention/Capillary Pressure Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Resolving Structural Influences on Water-Retention Properties of Alluvial Deposits

^a U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 421, Menlo Park, CA 94025
^b U.S. Geological Survey, 5735 Kearny Villa Road, San Diego, CA 92123
^* Corresponding author (jrnimmo{at}usgs.gov)

With the goal of improving property-transfer model (PTM) predictions of unsaturated hydraulic properties, we investigated the influence of sedimentary structure, defined as particle arrangement during deposition, on laboratory-measured water retention (water content vs. potential [()]) of 10 undisturbed core samples from alluvial deposits in the western Mojave Desert, California. The samples were classified as having fluvial or debris-flow structure based on observed stratification and measured spread of particle-size distribution. The () data were fit with the Rossi–Nimmo junction model, representing water retention with three parameters: the maximum water content (_max), the -scaling parameter (_o), and the shape parameter (). We examined trends between these hydraulic parameters and bulk physical properties, both textural—geometric mean, M_g, and geometric standard deviation, _g, of particle diameter—and structural—bulk density, _b, the fraction of unfilled pore space at natural saturation, A_e, and porosity-based randomness index, _s, defined as the excess of total porosity over 0.3. Structural parameters _s and A_e were greater for fluvial samples, indicating greater structural pore space and a possibly broader pore-size distribution associated with a more systematic arrangement of particles. Multiple linear regression analysis and Mallow's C_p statistic identified combinations of textural and structural parameters for the most useful predictive models: for _max, including A_e, _s, and _g, and for both _o and , including only textural parameters, although use of A_e can somewhat improve _o predictions. Textural properties can explain most of the sample-to-sample variation in () independent of deposit type, but inclusion of the simple structural indicators A_e and _s can improve PTM predictions, especially for the wettest part of the () curve.

Abbreviations: OG, Oro Grande • PSD, particle-size distribution • PTM, property-transfer model • SC, Sheep Creek

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Nimmo, W. N. Herkelrath, and A. M. Laguna Luna Physically Based Estimation of Soil Water Retention from Textural Data: General Framework, New Models, and Streamlined Existing Models Vadose Zone J., October 8, 2007; 6(4): 766 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]