VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 9 April 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:244-254 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0138
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-González, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-González, R. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-González, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR
Right arrow Other Geophysical Methods

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Performance of the Commercial WET Capacitance Sensor as Compared with Time Domain Reflectometry in Volcanic Soils

Carlos M. Regalado*, Axel Ritter and Rosa M. Rodríguez-González

Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias (ICIA), Dep. Suelos y Riegos, Apdo. 60, La Laguna, 38200 Tenerife, Spain. The mention of trade or manufacturer names is made for information only and does not imply an endorsement, recommendation, or exclusion by ICIA-Agricultural Research Institute
* Corresponding author (cregalad{at}icia.es).

Received 21 September 2006.

Among different alternatives, dielectric capacitance sensors may provide simultaneous readings of the volumetric water content and the soil solution electrical conductivity in the same sample volume at low cost. Reliability of capacitive sensors may be questioned, however, due to the low signal frequency at which they work, and also because of soil electrical conductivity effects on the water content estimation. In this study we evaluated the commercial capacitive WET Sensor (Delta-T Devices Ltd., Burwell, UK) compared with time domain reflectometry (TDR) in three volcanic soils with different textures. Although the WET Sensor uses internally the Hilhorst approach for describing the relationship between soil moisture and bulk and pore water electrical conductivity, results suggest that the Vogeler model is a better choice for the soils studied. The sensor provides good estimation of the bulk electrical conductivity, but determination of soil water content is biased. Thus, we propose an alternative empirical equation to determine the volumetric water content from the WET Sensor readings, the soil bulk density, and an estimate of the sensor's effective frequency.

Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion • EC, electrical conductivity • TDR, time domain reflectometry.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.