HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Deurer, M. Articles by Bachmann, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Deurer, M. Articles by Bachmann, J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Deurer, M. Articles by Bachmann, J. Related Collections Water Flow Models Water repellency

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water-Repellent Soil: 2. A Conceptual Numerical Simulation

^a Sustainable Land Use Team, HortResearch, Tennent Dr., P.O. Box 11030, Palmerston North, New Zealand
^b Institute of Soil Science, Univ. of Hannover, Herrenhäuserstr. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany
^* Corresponding author (markus.deurer{at}hortresearch.co.nz).

Received 19 April 2006.

A new approach by Bachmann et al. describes the wetting behavior of soil with reduced wettability with a macroscopic dynamic contact angle concept. The contact angle (CA) is hysteretic and depends on both time and water content. A maximum CA is reached at the permanent wilting point and decreases during rewetting until achieving the minimum CA at a water content close to field capacity. To simulate water flow in a soil with dynamic wettability, we expand the van Genuchten parameterization of hydraulic properties to include the macroscopic CA. Both pore and pore-surface properties can vary in space. We tested the new parameterization approach by simulating one drying–rewetting cycle in a forest soil profile. Our drying–rewetting cycle is a simplified scenario for a seasonal climate where a prolonged dry period is followed by a wet period. We could qualitatively reproduce many observations of water dynamics typically attributed to water-repellent soils. The infiltration of water into hydrophobic soil created a distribution, fingering, and redistribution zone. With rewetting, the fingers slowly widened and finally dissipated. We further analyzed the sensitivity of the simulated water flow processes to the different wettability parameters. Fingers form where the average maximum CA is large (90°) but not in case of subcritical water repellency (average maximum CA <90°). The magnitude of the critical water content and the degree of pore heterogeneity also influence the initiation and stability of fingers. The infiltration into the root zone and the drainage out of the soil profile are highly sensitive to the degree and persistence of water repellency.

Abbreviations: CA, contact angle • WDPTT, water drop penetration time test

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bachmann, M. Deurer, and G. Arye Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water-Repellent Soil: 1. Development of a Contact Angle Dependent Water-Retention Model Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2007; 6(3): 436 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]