VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 October 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:746-758 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0170
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kluitenberg, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kluitenberg, G. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kluitenberg, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Thermal Properties
Right arrow Heat Transport

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Sensitivity of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Method to Spatial Variations in Heat Capacity and Water Content

John H. Knighta, Wei Jinb and Gerard J. Kluitenbergb,*

a CSIRO Land and Water, 120 Meiers Rd., Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, and Dep. of Environmental Engineering, Griffith Univ., Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
b Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506. Contribution no. 07-97-J from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan

* Corresponding author (gjk{at}ksu.edu).

Received 21 November 2006.

Dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) sensors are useful for measuring soil heat capacity (C) and water content ({theta}), yet little is known about their effective measurement volume. We have adapted previous work on well testing to investigate the spatial sensitivity of the DPHP method for measuring both C and {theta}. Spatial sensitivity functions were derived by using a perturbation expansion approach in which C and {theta} vary with position, but differ only slightly from their uniform values C0 and {theta}0, respectively. Because the dimensionless forms of these spatial sensitivity functions are identical, the spatial sensitivity of the DPHP method is the same for both C and {theta} measurements. The spatial sensitivity function is not radially symmetric about the heater probe. Instead, the locations of the temperature and heater probes are of equal importance in defining the spatial sensitivity. The spatial sensitivity is greatest in small areas immediately outside of the heater and temperature probes. Far from the sensor, contours of equal spatial sensitivity approach the shapes of a family of ellipses. For a sensor with a probe spacing of 6 mm, the boundary containing 99% of the total spatial sensitivity is closely approximated by an ellipse with area 168 mm2 and a major axis 15.6 mm in length. The spatial sensitivity for C is unaffected by the magnitude of the soil thermal properties near the sensor, as long as the thermal properties are uniform. Likewise, for {theta} measurements, the spatial sensitivity is independent of the value of {theta} near the sensor, as long as {theta} is uniform.

Abbreviations: DPHP, dual-probe heat-pulse







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.