HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ines, A. V.M. Articles by Mohanty, B. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ines, A. V.M. Articles by Mohanty, B. P. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Ines, A. V.M. Articles by Mohanty, B. P. Related Collections Hydraulic Conductivity Effective Parameters Uncertainty Analysis

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Near-Surface Soil Moisture Assimilation for Quantifying Effective Soil Hydraulic Properties under Different Hydroclimatic Conditions

Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., 2117 TAMU, 201 Scoates Hall, College Station, TX 77843
^* Corresponding author (bmohanty{at}tamu.edu).

Received 28 March 2007.

We conducted a validation study of a newly developed near-surface soil moisture assimilation scheme for estimating effective soil hydraulic properties using soil moisture data from different hydroclimatic regions, including semihumid Oklahoma, humid Iowa and Illinois, and temperate humid China. A genetic algorithm (GA) was used to estimate the effective soil water retention (h) and hydraulic conductivity K(h) functions of an effective modeling domain by minimizing errors between observed near-surface soil moisture and values simulated with the Richards-based Soil–Water–Atmosphere–Plant (SWAP) model. The parameter estimation approach considered uncertainties in the initial and bottom boundary conditions, rooting depth, and root density by creating simulation ensembles based on combinations of several modeling conditions and a multipopulation approach in the GA to estimate uncertainties in the derived soil hydraulic properties. The results showed that (h) is not very sensitive to variations in the initial and boundary conditions, rooting depth, and root density applied on the modeling domain. The value of K(h) was found to be more sensitive to variations in rooting depth and root density than to variations in the initial and boundary conditions. With the modeling domain better represented, the estimated (h) and K(h) functions were found to be satisfactory in most of the locations studied. They were validated using laboratory-measured (h) and K_sat, observed soil moisture in the field, and soil hydraulic properties from the UNSODA database. Our study indicates, however, that the homogeneous-medium assumption commonly used to effectively describe a heterogeneous system may fail to closely represent a highly heterogeneous (layered) soil profile if only the near-surface soil moisture data are used to define the subsurface soil hydraulic properties. Additional soil moisture data from deeper depths may be needed to better estimate the effective soil hydraulic properties of highly heterogeneous systems.

Abbreviations: DOY, day of the year • ET, evapotranspiration • GA, genetic algorithm • MBE, mean bias error • SCAN, Soil Climate Analysis Network • SMEX02, Soil Moisture Experiment 2002 • SPG97, Southern Great Plains 1997 • SWAP, Soil–Water–Atmosphere–Plant model • TDR, time domain reflectometry