VZJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 January 2008
Published in Vadose Zone J 7:97-111 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0108
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hector, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hector, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hector, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial and Colloid Transport Models

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Modeling Transport of Microbes in Ten Undisturbed Soils under Effluent Irrigation

Liping Panga,*, Malcolm McLeodb, Jacqueline Aislabieb, Jirka Simunekc, Murray Closea and Ross Hectora

a Institute of Environmental Science & Research Ltd, P.O. Box 29181, Christchurch, New Zealand
b Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand
c Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92507

* Corresponding author (Liping.pang{at}esr.cri.nz).

Received 8 June 2007.

The HYDRUS-1D mobile–immobile water model (MIM) was used to evaluate the transport of fecal coliforms, Salmonella bacteriophage, and Br in 10 soils. At a flux of 5 mm h–1, a pulse of dairy shed effluent was applied to 30 large undisturbed lysimeters, followed by water irrigation. Soil types included clayey gley soil, clay loam, silt loam, silt loam over gravels, fine sandy loam, dune sand soil, pumice soil, and allophanic soil. Except for dune sand, modeling results showed lower mobile water contents and dispersivities for microbes than for Br, indicating the exclusion of microbes from smaller pores. The MIM-derived removal rates were in the order: volcanic soils > greywacke-derived silt loams > granular young sandy soils, and were the most variable in clayey gley loam and silt loam over gravels. Microbial reduction was 100% in allophanic soil, 16 to 18 log m–1 in pumice soil (where the unit log is the log10 reduction in maximum concentration compared with the original concentration), and was lowest in clayey gley soil (0.1–2 log m–1). For most of the other soils, the reduction was 2 to 3 log m–1, except for 9 to 10 log m–1 for fecal coliforms in a fine sandy loam. The detachment rate was only 1% of the attachment rate, indicating irreversible attachment of microbes. Soil structure (macroporosity) appeared to play the most important role in the transport of microbes and Br, while soil lithology had the greatest influence on attenuation and mass exchange. The general pattern of predicted mobile water content agrees with the measured macroporosity, which is positively related to leaching vulnerability but negatively related to dispersivity.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • cfu, colony-forming unit, a unit indicating the number of bacteria present in a water sample • DSE, dairy-shed effluent • PV, pore volume







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.