VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mathison, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mathison, J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Mathison, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Flow
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Physics

The Influence of Hydraulic Nonequilibrium on Pressure Plate Data

G. W. Gee*,a, A. L. Warda, Z. F. Zhanga, G. S. Campbellb and J. Mathisonc

a Hydrology Group, Environmental Technology Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99353, USA
b Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA
c Washington State University, Pullman, WA



View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Methods for measuring water-retention characteristics. Note that no single measurement method spans the full range of matric suctions (after Gee and Ward, 1999).

 



View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Time course of soil water matric suction for sand-equilibrated at 0.03 MPa (0.3 bar) on various pressure plates as indicated for (a), the 5-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b) the soil–plate interface.

 



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Time course of soil water matric suction for sand equilibrated at 0.5 MPa (5 bar) on various pressure plates as indicated for (a), the 5-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b)the soil–plate interface.

 



View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Time course of soil water matric suction for silt loam equilibrated at 0.03 MPa (0.3 bar) on various pressure plates as indicated for (a), the 5-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b) the soil–plate interface.

 



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Time course of soil water matric suction for silt loam equilibrated at 0.5 MPa (5 bar) on various pressure plates as indicated for (a), the 5-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b) the soil–plate interface.

 



View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Time course of soil water matric suction for sand equilibrated at 0.03 MPa (0.3 bar) on various thin plates of various conductivities for (a), the 5-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b) the soil–plate interface.

 



View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Time course of soil water matric suction for thin soil sample of sand equilibrated at 0.03 MPa (0.3 bar) on various pressure plates for (a), the 1-mm height (sample midpoint) and (b)the soil–plate interface.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.