VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 January 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:149-157 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0114
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Redox Processes
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Uranium Immobilization by Hydrogen Sulfide Gaseous Treatment under Vadose Zone Conditions

Lirong Zhonga,*, Edward C. Thorntona and Baolin Dengb

a Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA 99354
b Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Soil treatment column effluent normalized H2S concentration. Q is the flow rate of the gas mixture through the column.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effluent H2S concentration and moisture from the column of soil treated with the moisturized gas mixture.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. (A) Effluent U(VI) and fraction of U immobilized, and (B) effluent O2 concentration in column tests. Test Col-II: untreated Hanford Site soil; Col-III: soil treated with dry H2S–N2 gas; Col-IV: soil treated with the moisturized gas mixture. Uranium(VI) in simulated groundwater (SGW) at similar concentration was used as the influent in all tests; DIW is deionized water.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Sorption isotherms for U(VI) in deionized water (DIW) and in simulated grounwater (SGW) sorbed to pristine Hanford soil. The symbols are measured data and the lines are the best fit using the Freundlich model.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Activity diagram illustrating stability fields of U(VI) aqueous and solid species (shaded field) for pCO2 = 10–3.5 and under oxidizing conditions in (A) deionized water and (B) simulated groundwater. Symbol indicates the location of the solution used in this work.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Immobilized U concentration in sediments across column. The distance from the column influent end was measured from the center of each section. Uranium(IV) was determined based on the measured total U and U(VI) concentration.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.