VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 17 May 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:316-326 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0044
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seaman, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seaman, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. K.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seaman, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, M. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Geochemical Processes
Right arrow Recharge
Right arrow Colloid-Facilitated Transport
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange

Research in Support of Remediation Activities at the Savannah River Site

J. C. Seamana,*, B. B. Looneyb and M. K. Harrisb

a Savannah River Ecology Lab., The Univ. of Georgia, Drawer E, Aiken, SC 29802
b Savannah River National Laboratory, Aiken SC 29808


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Regional location of the SRS (top), and major site facilities and primary contaminants (bottom) (adapted from Mamatey, 2006).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Hydrostratigraphy units at the Savannah River Site (modified from Aadland et al., 1995; Fallaw and Price, 1995).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Conceptual diagram illustrating the pump-and-treat remediation strategy used to address the plumes originating from the F- and H-Area seepage basins.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. (a) Tracer breakthrough field experiments conducted at the H-Area Injection Test Site for Well S6 Zone 3 located 4.41 m from the injection well compared with (b) that observed in laboratory columns using similar materials typical of Atlantic Coastal Plain sediments underlying the SRS (Seaman et al., 2007b; Seaman, 1998).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. (Left) Sheet-pile dam installed adjacent to Fourmile Branch stream in 2000 and (right) the pond (9.6 million-L storage capacity) resulting from seep-line flow associated with the burial ground–derived tritium plume.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Tritium activities (pCi mL–1) in Fourmile Branch stream from September 2000 to October 2003 (redrawn after Hitchcock et al., 2005).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.