VZJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Physics
Vadose Zone Journal 1:316-319 (2002)
© 2002 Soil Science Society of America

Notes

Shaft-Mounted Time Domain Reflectometry Probe for Water Content and Electrical Conductivity Measurements

Magnus Persson*,a and Jon M. Wraithb

a Dep. of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
b Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120

* Corresponding author (magnus.persson{at}tvrl.lth.se)

Received 21 February 2002.



    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
A new shaft-mounted time domain reflectometry (TDR) probe design is described and evaluated. In contrast to previous shaft-mounted TDR probes (SMPs), the new design may be used to measure both dielectric constant (Ka) and bulk electrical conductivity ({sigma}a). Two SMP prototypes, 0.03 and 0.04 m long and having diameters of 0.006 m, were evaluated. The probes were calibrated in several fluids having different Ka and {sigma}a. A primary advantage of the SMP is minimal physical probe length without sacrificing accuracy of Ka readings. Accuracy of Ka measurements for the new probes was similar to that of standard 0.20-m-long three-rod probes.

Abbreviations: PVC, polyvinyl chloride • SMP, shaft-mounted TDR probe • TDR, time domain reflectometry


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY (TDR) has become an important tool for measurement of soil water content ({theta}) and bulk electrical conductivity ({sigma}a). The TDR instrument sends a high frequency electromagnetic signal along a probe buried in the soil. The signal is reflected at the end of the probe and the travel time of the signal can be measured from the resulting waveform. The travel time can be related to dielectric constant (Ka), which in turn can be related to {theta}. Additionally, the attenuation of the reflected signal can be related to {sigma}a. Each of these attributes and both in combination are useful in a variety of research and management applications (Jones et al., 2002).

Although TDR has been used for more than two decades, surprisingly little emphasis has been focused on TDR probe development. In most applications, TDR probes consisting of two or three metal rods, from a few centimeters up to 30 or 50 cm in length have been used. The accuracy of the Ka measurement depends on the travel time of the signal along the probe, and on the uncertainty in the calibration equation between {theta} and Ka. If the travel time is sufficiently long, the uncertainty of TDR {theta} measurements is generally <0.02 m3 m-3. Using a standard TDR instrument, the practical lower limit of probe length to maintain accuracy of {theta} measurement is generally considered as 0.10 to 0.15 m (Heimovaara, 1993). Shorter probes can also be used successfully if {theta} is consistently high, or with higher frequency TDR devices.

Time domain reflectometry probes having small physical size and spatial sensitivity are desirable for many applications. An efficient means of reducing the physical length of TDR probes without reducing the travel time (i.e., transmission line length) was presented by Nissen et al. (1998). They developed a miniature coil TDR probe only 15 mm long. Their design reduced the physical length of the probe by a factor of five, while maintaining adequate electromagnetic length, and hence without affecting {theta} measurement accuracy. Vaz and Hopmans (2001) constructed a shaft-mounted TDR probe (SMP). Their probe consisted of two parallel copper wires, 0.8 mm in diameter and 30 cm long, coiled around a 5-cm-long polyvinyl chloride (PVC) core with 3-mm wire separation along the core. Neither of these probes was capable of {sigma}a measurement because of the lacquer or epoxy coating used to cover transmission wires.

The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a compact TDR probe that is capable of measuring both Ka and {sigma}a. We desired that the probe have accuracy similar to standard two- and three-rod probe designs. Furthermore, it was important that the resulting waveform traces be amenable to analysis using standard TDR software.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
TDR System
All TDR measurements were performed using a Tektronix (Beaverton, OR) 1502C cable tester with RS232 interface connected to a laptop computer. Estimates of Ka and {sigma}a were calculated from the TDR trace using WinTDR99 software (Soil Physics Group, Utah State University, Logan, UT). Two standard three-rod probes, 0.20 m in length with a wire diameter of 0.003 m and a spacing of 0.05 m between the two outer rods (Soilmoisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA), were used for reference Ka measurements. The reference TDR probes were calibrated using the approach suggested by Heimovaara (1993). Reference electrical conductivity measurements were made using a digital conductivity meter (Shott-Geräte, Hofheim, Germany).

Shaft-Mounted TDR Probe Design
The basic concept of the SMP is to coil the signal transmission wires around a cylindrical core, thus reducing the physical length of the probe without compromising the travel time of the electromagnetic wave. Plexiglas was selected as the core material, although it is rather brittle and sometimes shattered during SMP construction. Nissen et al. (1998) used PVC as core material for their coil probe, but we considered PVC as less suitable for our SMP since it lacks rigidity. An ideal core material should also have high Ka (Plexiglas and PVC have Ka of about 3) to maintain travel times as large as possible. Insignificant water absorption is also an important property of a suitable core material. The diameter of the SMP was chosen with consideration of Rothe et al. (1997), who showed that TDR probe installation can lead to compaction of the soil near the probe rods, producing significant measurement artifact for rod diameters greater than about 6 mm.

Two different SMP prototypes were manufactured, referred to as SMP1 and SMP2. The SMP1 probe consisted of a 6-mm Plexiglas rod with two 0.8-mm stainless-steel wires coiled around it. The ground and conductor wires were separated by 2 mm. The wired portion of the rod was 40 mm long, which meant that the ground and conductor wires were 190 mm long. The SMP2 was similar to SMP1, but 0.6-mm stainless-steel wires were used, with a 1.25-mm separation distance. The wired part was 30 mm long with a wire length of 225 mm.

To manufacture the SMPs, the Plexiglas core was threaded with dual threads to serve as a guide for the transmission wires. The two stainless-steel wires were coiled around the core and glued in place with epoxy glue. After the glue had hardened, the core was machined down to a diameter of 6 mm to provide a smooth surface, leaving the partially milled bare wires in contact with the surrounding media. A small brass head was glued to the Plexiglas core at the distal end of the probe to facilitate insertion into soils. The stainless-steel wires were soldered to the conductor and ground of an RG58 coaxial cable, respectively. The cable lengths were 2.8 and 3.4 m for the SMP1 and SMP2, respectively. The solder joints and wire interface at the proximal probe end were covered by a 9.6-mm Plexiglas tube, which was filled with epoxy. The SMP2 probe design is shown in Fig. 1.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Design schematic for the SMP2 shaft-mounted TDR probe. All lengths are in millimeters.

 
Shaft-Mounted TDR Probe Calibration
Since the sample volume of the SMP contains not only the medium of interest, that is, the medium surrounding the probe, but also the shaft itself, calibration of target media Ka and {sigma}a measurements are required. In dielectric mixing models, describing the contribution from x different compounds having different Ka values to the average Ka of the mixture, the contribution from the components is assumed constant if their geometric positions and volume fractions are constant within the applied electric field (Ferré et al., 1996). In the SMP four different materials will be present in the measurement volume: the lacquer coating, the epoxy, the Plexiglas shaft, and the surrounding media. Since the Ka of epoxy (3.6; Weast, 1986) and lacquer (2.8; Nissen et al., 1998) are close to the Ka of Plexiglas (2.7; Weast, 1986), and because they only occupy a small fraction of the total measurement volume, the contributions of epoxy and lacquer to the measured Ka can be neglected. Thus, it is possible to describe the contribution of these media using a two-phase dielectric mixing model

[1]
with w as a weighting factor describing the fractional contribution of the Plexiglas and Ksurr as the dielectric constant of the surrounding media. The exponent n summarizes the geometry of the medium with relation to the applied electrical field.

To relate the Ka measured by SMP to Ka measured by the reference TDR probes, measurements were made in air and several fluids. The fluids used were rapeseed oil, ethyl acetate, syrup, ethanol, 75% ethanol mixed with 25% water (v/v), 50% ethanol in water, and water. Fifteen measurements were completed with replicate reference probes and SMPs in all fluids, and the means of measurements with the two reference probes were used as reference Ka values to optimize w and n for each SMP.

We also examined the variability of the SMP Ka measurements. This was done by using the measured Ka and the best-fit w and n parameters to calculate the Ksurr for each of the 15 measurements in each fluid. The measurement standard deviation was also calculated for the two reference probes (Fig. 3).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Standard deviation of estimated target media dielectric constant Ksurr based on measured shaft-mounted TDR probe (SMP) Ka and Eq. [1], along with standard deviations for the two 0.20-m-long reference TDR probes. All standard deviations are based on 15 measurements for each probe.

 
The resistive load (RL) across a TDR probe may be easily measured and related to the electrical conductivity of the target medium (Heimovaara et al., 1995; Jones et al., 2002). The SMP RL measurements were calibrated to {sigma}a by comparing the measured RL with {sigma}a measured by the reference electrical conductivity meter in salt solutions over a range of 0.0012 to 7.42 dS m-1. Twenty-two salt solutions with different {sigma}a were used, with 10 SMP and 10 three-rod TDR probe measurements obtained in each solution. Similarly to Nissen et al. (1999) in calculating {sigma}a for their printed circuit board TDR probes, we used the method suggested by Heimovaara et al. (1995)

[2]
where Kp is the probe cell constant and Rcable is the contribution to RL from the combined series resistances of the cable tester, cables, connectors, and the probe head.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
Both prototype SMPs provided very distinct TDR traces, similar to those presented by Vaz and Hopmans (2001). Start and end travel time waveform reflections were easily detected by the WinTDR99 software.

The parameters w and n (Eq. [1]) obtained using nonlinear optimization of SMP and reference probe Ka are presented in Table 1. The fact that n is very close to 1 and that w is not far from 0.5 shows that the dielectric materials surrounding the probe rods are close to a parallel distribution with respect to the applied electromagnetic field. This is fortunate because the sample volume of the probe then can be expected to be only a weak function of Ksurr (Ferré et al., 2001). The Ksurr calculated from the SMP-measured Ka using Eq. [1] was in close agreement with Ka measured using the reference probes (Fig. 2). Both SMPs had similar parameter values, and Eq. [1] fit the data well (Table 1). Repeatability of Ka measurements using the SMPs was comparable to that of standard 0.20-m-long three-rod probes (Fig. 3). If the Ka is converted to {theta} using the Topp et al. (1980) equation, the average standard deviation of the {theta} estimation was about 0.003 m3 m-3 for all probes (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Best fit calibration parameters of Eq. [1] and [2] for two shaft-mounted TDR probe (SMP) designs.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Measured effective shaft-mounted TDR probe (SMP) dielectric constant Ka vs. reference probe Ka, including best-fit calibration lines from Table 1, in seven different fluids and air.

 
Agreement between {sigma}a as measured using SMPs and the electrical conductivity meter was excellent (Table 1). Calibrated probe constants (Kp) and cable resistances for both probes were similar. The standard deviations of the SMP-measured {sigma}a were similar to those of the reference probes.

The measurement volume geometry of the SMPs has not yet been characterized. However, if we assume that we have a parallel distribution of the dielectrics, the sampling volume can be estimated by using the definition of spatial sensitivity of Knight (1992) for a standard two-rod probe. On the basis of this analysis, we conclude that about 90% of the SMP sampling volume would be confined by a cylinder approximately 7 mm in radius, and 70% of the sampling volume by a cylinder with a radius of approximately 5 mm.


    CONCLUSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 
A new design for a small-scale shaft-mounted TDR probe was developed and evaluated. A primary advantage of the new probe is that it may be used to measure both water content and electrical conductivity, in contrast to previous designs. Two different SMPs were constructed, one 40 mm long and another 30 mm long, both with a diameter of 6 mm. Accuracy and precision of Ka measurements using both SMPs were comparable to those of standard 0.20-m-long three-rod probes. Agreement between electrical conductivity meter and calibrated SMP measurements of {sigma}a in salt solutions over a range of 0.0012 to 7.42 dS m-1 was also excellent.

As with the miniature coil probe presented by Nissen et al. (1998), spatial sensitivity of the SMPs are very small and only extend a few millimeters from the shaft. This would make the SMPs ideal for localized estimates of Ka and {sigma}a, and will be an advantage for some measurement applications. However, careful installation of these (and other) miniature probes will be important since air gaps near the shaft would lead to significant errors.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council through the grant "Geoelectrical measurements of soil water content and pollutant concentration over multiple scales."


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Lungal and B. C. Si
Coiled Time Domain Reflectometry Matric Potential Sensor
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1422 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Persson, J. M. Wraith, and T. Dahlin
A Small-Scale Matric Potential Sensor Based on Time Domain Reflectometry
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 533 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. Persson
Estimating Surface Soil Moisture from Soil Color Using Image Analysis
Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1119 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. Persson, S. Haridy, J. Olsson, and J. Wendt
Solute Transport Dynamics by High-Resolution Dye Tracer Experiments--Image Analysis and Time Moments
Vadose Zone J., August 16, 2005; 4(3): 856 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. A. Robinson, D. A. Robinson, S. B. Jones, J. M. Wraith, D. Or, and S. P. Friedman
A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 444 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Persson and S. Haridy
Estimating Water Content from Electrical Conductivity Measurements with Short Time-Domain Reflectometry Probes
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 478 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wraith, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Physics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome