VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity/Relative Permeability
Right arrow Variably Saturated Fluid Flow
Published in Vadose Zone Journal 2:313-321 (2003)
© 2003 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

A Tensorial Connectivity–Tortuosity Concept to Describe the Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties of Anisotropic Soils

Z. Fred Zhang*, Andy L. Ward and Glendon W. Gee

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA
* Corresponding author (fred.zhang{at}pnl.gov).

Received 4 December 2002.



    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The anisotropy in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is saturation dependent. Yet, there are few options for modeling this phenomenon in natural soils. A tensorial connectivity–tortuosity (TCT) concept is proposed to describe the unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity. The TCT concept assumes that soil pore connectivity and/or tortuosity are anisotropic and can be described using a tensor. Saturation-dependent anisotropy can be easily invoked in common models of relative permeability by incorporating the connectivity tensor. Synthetic Miller-similar soils having hypothetical anisotropy are defined by allowing the saturated hydraulic conductivity to have different correlation range for different directions of flow. The TCT concept was tested using the synthetic soils with four levels of heterogeneity and four levels of anisotropy. The results show that the soil water retention curves were independent of flow direction but dependent on soil heterogeneity, while the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient is a function of both soil heterogeneity and anisotropy. The TCT model can accurately describe the unsaturated hydraulic functions of anisotropic soils and can be easily combined with commonly used relative permeability functions for use in numerical solutions of the flow equation.

Abbreviations: TCT, tensorial connectivity–tortuosity • 2-D, two-dimensional


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
IT IS WELL known that natural porous media are often anisotropic, as reflected in the dependence on sample orientation (e.g., Bear et al. 1987). Soil anisotropy is caused by grain orientation, the presence of layers, and/or the structure of the soil (e.g., Dabney and Selim, 1987). A soil composed of ellipsoid-shaped grains would have a greater permeability parallel to the grain orientation than crossing the grain orientation. In multilayered soils, the apparent permeability parallel to layering is usually calculated as the arithmetic mean of individual values of each layer, while permeability normal to layering is calculated as the harmonic mean (e.g., Fetter, 1994; Kutilek and Nielsen, 1994). The primary consequence of anisotropy is that subsurface water movement may have strong lateral flow components, especially where infiltration occurs into highly stratified soils.

The effects of saturation on soil anisotropy in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity have not been well described mathematically. In unsaturated media, it is often assumed that the anisotropy at moisture contents less than saturation is the same as at complete saturation (e.g., Neuman, 1973). This assumption was questioned by Zaslavsky and Sinai (1981), who analyzed the effect of sloping layered soil on the unsaturated flow pattern. They suggested that while each layer is uniform and isotropic, the whole soil profile behaves anisotropically. Using a two-layer soil of finite thickness, they calculated the lateral flux component and defined a coefficient of anisotropy. The authors concluded that the anisotropy coefficient can range from zero at extremely low rate of rainfall up to the order of 106 for high rainfall rate. Laboratory and field experiments have subsequently confirmed that anisotropy is saturation dependent (Stephens and Heermann, 1988; McCord et al. 1991). Recently, Ursino et al. (2000) conducted laboratory experiments in a sand tank model packed to be heterogeneous and anisotropic with a sandy soil. The ratio of correlation length of the structure was 1:10. Steady-state water contents were observed at three different water fluxes. They found that increasing the flux increased the mean water saturation and reduced the anisotropy factor of the hydraulic conductivity tensor.

Mualem (1984) proposed a conceptual model to quantify saturation-dependent soil anisotropy. The soil was assumed to consist of numerous thin parallel layers having different hydraulic properties. Variation of the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) among the layers was described by a probability density distribution. The model indicates that the degree of anisotropy of unsaturated soil may vary considerably from its value at saturation. When the pressure head is reduced gradually from zero, the anisotropy factor first decreases to a minimum and then increases rapidly as the soil dries. In some cases, the anisotropy factor can reach values several orders of magnitude higher than at saturation. A wide range of permeability distribution of the layers may enhance anisotropy of unsaturated soil.

Theoretical analysis based on stochastic methods (Yeh et al., 1985) suggests that in a steady flow field the anisotropy of a stratified heterogeneous soil should increase as the mean pressure head (and moisture content) of the soil decreases. Khaleel et al. (2002) coupled the stochastic method with Monte Carlo simulations to investigate effective flow and transport properties for unsaturated coarse-textured media under relatively dry conditions. They also found that the macroscopic anisotropy increased with decreasing saturation. Using the stochastic approach, Polmann et al. (1991) presented a generalized model to account for tension-dependent anisotropy. They assumed that the soil unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function obeyed the Gardner (1958) relationship and the horizontal correlation scales were much larger than the vertical correlation scales. However, application of the Polmann et al. (1991) model requires the knowledge of the variance of ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity, the correlation between hydraulic parameters, and the vertical correlation length. Typically, such information is not readily available.

Recognizing that none of these studies considered anisotropy at the pore scale, Ursino et al. (2001) derived analytical expressions for the macroscopic anisotropic conductivity tensor for different pore-scale geometries. The expressions show that the geometry of the microstructure can lead to anisotropic behavior at the macroscopic scale. Anisotropy in the hydraulic conductivity switched from values <1 to values >1 or vice versa, depending on saturation. However, the existence of a switching point of anisotropy may not be always true.

There are different types of models available to describe the relationship between unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity and pressure head or water content (e.g., Gardner, 1958; Burdine, 1953; Mualem, 1976). As was pointed out by Bear et al. (1987), essentially all models of unsaturated flow represent the effective hydraulic conductivity (K) of an anisotropic porous medium as a product of the saturated hydraulic conductivity tensor, and a relative hydraulic conductivity (Kr):

[1]
where p denotes the hydraulic parameters other than the saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks. In these models, the same relative conductivity is often assumed to apply to both the horizontal and vertical directions. Consequently, the magnitude of the anisotropy remains constant throughout the entire range of saturations. This is contrary to the aforementioned theoretical and experimental studies.

The objective of this study was to extend existing hydraulic functions to allow description of saturation-dependent anisotropy by introducing a TCT concept. The TCT concept was tested using numerical experiments of two-dimensional (2-D) flow through synthetic soils with different degrees of heterogeneity and anisotropy.


    THEORY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Mathematical Relationships
Soil Water Retention Curve
The soil water retention curve can be described by the Brooks–Corey (1966) relationship:

[2]
or the van Genuchten (1980) model:

[3]
where Se denotes the effective saturation of the soil and is calculated by

[4]
where {theta}s and {theta}r are the saturated and residual water content, respectively; {theta} is water content; he is the pressure head at air entry; {lambda} and n are fitting parameters that characterize the width of pore size distribution; {alpha} is a fitting parameter that is inversely proportional to the pressure head at air entry; and m is a constant that is commonly approximated by m = 1 - 1/n (van Genuchten, 1980). Equation [2] or [3] may also be used to describe the retention curve of a heterogeneous soil with all the parameters being replaced by their corresponding effective values.

Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Isotropic Soils
With the assumption of pore continuity and connectivity, Burdine (1953) and Mualem (1976) proposed relationships for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in terms of water content or pressure head. A general expression of the two can be written as (Hoffmann-Riem et al., 1999)

[5a]
and

[5b]
where L is a lumped parameter that accounts for pore connectivity and tortuosity and hence is called the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient, and ß and {gamma} are constants. Equations [5a] and [5b] reduce to the Burdine (1953) relationship when ß = 2 and {gamma} = 1 and to the Mualem (1976) relationship when ß = 1 and {gamma} = 2.

Mualem (1976) noted that L might be positive or negative. He found that L = 0.5 was an optimal value for a data set of 45 disturbed and undisturbed samples. Schuh and Cline (1990) reported that L varied between -8.73 and +14.80 for a data set of 75 samples. Yates et al. (1992) found that L varied between -3.31 and values greater than +100 and the geometric mean of L was 0.63 with a 95% confidence interval between -0.88 and +2.44. Schaap and Leij (2000) estimated the hydraulic parameters of 235 samples from the UNSODA database by fitting them to the retention and conductivity data. They found that the values of L for all textural groups ranges from -6.97 to -1.22, with the lowest values for the loams and clays, although not all individual samples had a negative L. Nevertheless, the most common approach in modeling K(h) is to use a constant value of 0.5.

A Tensorial Connectivity–Tortuosity Concept
The saturated hydraulic conductivity of an anisotropic soil is dependent on the direction of measurement primarily because of directional differences in pore connectivities and tortuosities. As the soil is desaturated, the flow path becomes less connected and more tortuous than that when the soil is saturated. Since different soils have different pore size distributions, the degree of change in flow path tortuosity with desaturation can be expected to differ between soils. Due to different apparent particle size distributions in different directions, there is no reason to assume that the pore connectivity and tortuosity are the same in all directions. Many studies have shown that anisotropy under drier conditions is larger than that under wetter soil condition (e.g., Zaslavsky and Sinai, 1981; Stephens and Heermann, 1988; McCord et al., 1991). These studies show that when an anisotropic soil is desaturated the decrease of pore connectivity and tortuosity in the horizontal direction is different from those in the vertical direction. The effects of this variation of pore connection and tortuosity on K is characterized by the term SLe in Eq. [5a]. Hence, the value of parameter L could be dependent on flow direction in an anisotropic soil, suggesting that it would be better described by a tensor. Therefore, an unsaturated hydraulic conductivity tensor may be written as

[6]
where i = 1, 2, or 3, which denotes the direction parallel or normal to soil strata; Ksi is the saturated hydraulic conductivity at direction i; and Li is the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient at direction i. To test this concept, we simulated variably saturated flow in a series of hypothetical soils and observed the dependence of K on direction and pressure head.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
We generated synthetic soils using a geostatistical method by assigning different levels of spatial variability and anisotropy. Soil anisotropy was created by assigning different correlation lengths to different directions. The macroscopic hydraulic properties of the soils were then determined by running numerical experiments. The results of the numerical experiments were used to evaluate the ability of the TCT concept to describe the hydraulic properties of the hypothetical soils. Detailed description of the generation of the synthetic soils and numerical experiments are given below.

Synthetic Heterogeneous Soils
The hypothetical soils were generated in such a way that each soil is composed of 125000 soil elements, each one of which is homogeneous and isotropic but with properties different from an adjacent element. The soil elements were assembled into a composite by defining different correlation lengths in the three principal directions. Therefore, a composite soil was macroscopically anisotropic and heterogeneous.

The hydraulic properties of a soil element at spatial location s are defined by a nonhysteretic water retention characteristic, h({theta}; s) and an unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function K(h; s). To facilitate description of soil heterogeneity, the hypothetical soil is assumed to be Miller-similar (Miller and Miller, 1956) at the macroscopic scale. Thus, the entire domain is characterized by a reference state {{chi}*h, {chi}*K h*({theta}), K*({theta})}, with {chi} being the characteristic length, and a unique scaling relationship between the hydraulic functions at different spatial locations (Roth, 1995). In Miller-similar media, the relationship between h({theta}) at s and the reference state is given by (Sposito and Jury, 1990)

[7]
while the relationship between K({theta}) and the reference state is given by

[8]

To generate fields of h({theta}, s), {chi}h(s) was treated as a stationary random function with unique probability density and autocovariance functions. The logarithm of the scaling factor, f = log ({chi}h/{chi}*h), is assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and variance {sigma}2f (Roth,1995). An exponential covariance model with correlation lengths along the three principal directions was assumed for the autocovariance function. The autocovariance function was generated using sequential Gaussian simulation (SGSIM) program from the GSLIB library (Deutsch and Journel, 1992) with different correlation lengths ({lambda}) in the three principal directions. The full scaling invariance of the Richards equation for the whole soil domain requires a power law dependence of hydraulic conductivity on matric potential (Snyder, 1996):

[9]

The values of {chi}K were calculated using Eq. [9] with the assumption {omega} = 0.8 (M.L. Rockhold, personal communication, 2002).

In this study, soil heterogeneity was described by the variance of f, {sigma}2f. The geometric mean of Ks, Ksg, that of {alpha}, {alpha}g, and the variances of Y = ln(Ks), {sigma}2Y, and of A = ln({alpha}), {sigma}2A, were then calculated using the generated Ks and {alpha} (Table 1). Soil anisotropy was described by the ratio (R) of the correlation length of f at the direction parallel ({lambda}p) to and that normal ({lambda}n) to soil strata. Four levels of soil heterogeneity (i.e., {sigma}2f = 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0) and four levels of soil anisotropy (i.e., R = 1:1, 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1) were generated on a 1.0-m3 domain uniformly discretized with the grid spacing of 0.02 m. This produced a total of 16 synthetic soils. The van Genuchten (1980) model was chosen to describe the hydraulic properties of the soils. The statistics of soil parameters for the 16 synthetic sandy soils are summarized in Table 1. The remaining parameters were set being constants and equal to the typical values of a sandy soil; that is, n = 4.0, {theta}s = 0.40 m3 m-3, {theta}r = 0.0 m3 m-3, and L = 0.5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The statistics for the 16 synthetic soils. A larger value of the heterogeneity level or anisotropy level means more heterogeneous or more anisotropic soil.{dagger}

 
Examples of the spatial distribution of Y of the soils with variance being about 2.0 and different levels of anisotropy are shown in Fig. 1. As the value of R becomes larger, the soil shows stronger layering, suggesting greater pore connectivity in the principal x direction.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The contour of log(Ks) of the synthetic heterogeneous anisotropic soils with the {sigma}2Y = 2.0. The values of R are (a) 1, (b) 10, (c) 50, and (d) 100. Ks is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, R is the ratio of correlation length at the direction parallel to soil strata and that normal to soil strata, and Y = ln(Ks) and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
Numerical Experiments
Using the generated hypothetic soils, multistep numerical experiments of gravity-induced flow were performed under constant-head boundary conditions at both the top and bottom boundaries. The head values at the top and bottom boundaries were kept the same at a specific time so that gravity was the only driving force (i.e., flow occurred under a unit hydraulic-gradient condition). Thus, at steady state, water fluxes at the top and bottom were the same and equal to the hydraulic conductivity at the corresponding soil water pressure head. After steady-state conditions were reached at a given pressure, the pressure heads at the two boundaries were adjusted to new values. Flow in the synthetic soils was simulated using the STOMP flow simulator (White and Oostrom, 2000). Simulations of flow in a 2-D domain of 1.0 m2 with the discretization of 0.02 by 0.02 m for 160 yr typically took about 10 min.

Each numerical experiment started at saturation after which the soil was dewatered gradually in 32 steps of pressure heads from zero to -2.0 m. To make sure the flow was at steady state at each pressure head, the durations for each step were between 0.5 and 10 yr. The simulation time was longer when the soil became drier since the flow became slower. We could tell if the system was in steady state by comparing the water fluxes at the top and bottom boundaries. Unequal fluxes meant the system had not reached steady sate, and the simulation time was extended.

After determining the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in the direction normal to the soil strata, Kn(h), the 2-D soil slice was rotated 90°. The numerical simulation was repeated to determine the conductivity in the direction parallel to the soil strata, Kp(h).

After all the numerical experiments were completed, the mean values of h and {theta} for the whole 1 by 1 m soil domain were calculated for each step. In all, there were 64 pairs of h({theta}), 32 pairs of Kp(h), and 32 pairs of Kn(h) data for each soil. We chose to use the van Genuchten (1980) model to describe soil water retention curve. The 64 pairs of h({theta}) data were used to optimize the effective value of {alpha}, {alpha}e, and effective value of n, ne, while parameters {theta}s and {theta}r were fixed. Using the already optimized {alpha}e and ne as constants, the parameters in the direction parallel to the soil strata, Ksp and Lp, were then optimized with the Kp(h) data. Similarly, the parameters in the direction normal to soil strata, Ksn and Ln, were optimized to the Kn(h) data.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Soil Hydraulic Function
The results of the numerical experiments show that the retention curves obtained when flow was parallel to soil strata were the same as those when flow was normal to soil strata (Fig. 2). Hence, the retention curves are independent of flow direction. This can be explained by the fact that the soil water content of each homogeneous and isotropic soil element at a specific pressure head does not change when flow direction changes. Consequently, the average water content across the whole soil domain at a specific pressure head is also independent of flow direction.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Retention curves of anisotropic soils with different levels of heterogeneities and R = 50. Lines: best-fits parallel to soil strata (crosses) and normal to soil strata (circles). R is the ratio of correlation length at the direction parallel to soil strata and that normal to soil strata; {alpha} is the inverse macroscopic capillary length; n is the pore size distribution parameter; Y = ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity; and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
However, the water retention curve of a heterogeneous soil is dependent on heterogeneity (Fig. 3). The value of {alpha}e is positively correlated with {sigma}2Y of the soil, while the value of ne is negatively correlated with {sigma}2Y. The dependence of {alpha}e and ne on soil heterogeneity is due to the nonlinear relationship between {theta} and h. Figures 2 and 3 shows that both {alpha}e and ne are functions of soil heterogeneity but independent of soil anisotropy.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The relationship of (a) {alpha} vs. {sigma}2Y and (b) n vs. {sigma}2Y. {alpha} is the inverse macroscopic capillary length; n is the pore size distribution parameter; Y = ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity; and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
The effects of flow direction on the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity are shown in Fig. 4. In an isotropic soil (R = 1), the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity at a given h in the direction parallel to soil strata, Kp(h), was the same as that normal to soil the strata, Kn(h), as expected (Fig. 4a). As R became larger, Kp(h) became larger, while Kn(h) became smaller (Fig. 4b, 4c, and 4d) than the values of K(h) of the isotropic soil with nearly the same heterogeneity (Fig. 4a). The ratio of Kp(h) and Kn(h) became larger as h became more negative. For example, for Soil 11 with {sigma}2Y = 1.717 and R = 50 (Fig. 4c), when the soil was saturated, the saturated hydraulic conductivities parallel and normal to stratification were 1.56 x 10-4 and 5.08 x 10-5 m s-1, respectively, giving an anisotropy ratio Ksp/Ksn = 3.1. At a pressure head of -2.0 m, the hydraulic conductivities parallel and normal to stratification were 7.36 x 10-9 and 1.88 x 10-10 m s-1, respectively, resulting in Kp/Kn = 39.2. This means that unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is more anisotropic when the soils become drier. These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies (e.g., Stephens and Heermann, 1988; McCord et al. 1991).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of anisotropic heterogeneous soils with {sigma}2Y = 2.0. Lines: best-fits parallel to soil strata (crosses) and normal to soil strata (circles). Lp is the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient at the direction parallel to the strata and Ln at the direction normal to strata; R is the ratio of correlation length at the direction parallel to soil strata and that normal to soil strata; Y = ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity; and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
In general, anisotropy in the soil unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions is well described by Eq. [6], and the simulated values fit the observations well (Fig. 4). The relative errors of the optimization of Kp(h) and Kn(h) using the TCT model are shown in Fig. 5. The error is no more than 20% when h ranges from about -0.4 to -2.0 m. The error is slightly larger but no more than 50% when h is greater than -0.4 m. Considering that the measurement error of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity under controlled conditions is often larger than the error shown in Fig. 5, we conclude that the TCT model can accurately describe the unsaturated hydraulic functions of anisotropic soils.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The relative error in the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h), of anisotropic heterogeneous soils with {sigma}2Y = 2.0 when the tensorial connectivity–tortuosity (TCT) model is used to describe K(h) at the direction parallel to the soil strata, Kp(h) (crosses), and that at the direction normal to soil strata, Kn(h) (circles). Lp is the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient at the direction parallel to the strata and Ln at the direction normal to strata; R is the ratio of correlation length at the direction parallel to soil strata and that normal to soil strata; Y = ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity; and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
Different from the stochastic method, the TCT concept is used to deterministically describe saturation-dependent anisotropy in hydraulic conductivity. The L tensor describes all the effects on the effective hydraulic conductivity due to soil heterogeneity and spatial correlations, which need to be specified in the stochastic method (Polmann et al., 1991). The widely used hydraulic functions (e.g., Burdine, 1953; Mualem, 1976) can be easily extended by allowing L to take different values for the three principal orthogonal coordinate directions of flow. Hence, the TCT concept can be easily combined into commonly used relative permeability functions for use in numerical solutions of the flow equation.

Connectivity–Tortuosity Coefficient
Values of L for the soils with different levels of heterogeneity and anisotropy are depicted in Fig. 6. The value of L decreased linearly as the value of ln(R*) increased, where R* is the ratio of the correlation length of f in the direction parallel to flow and that normal to flow. Note that R* is defined relative to flow direction, while R was defined relative to the direction of soil strata. Hence, R* = R if flow is parallel to soil strata and R* = 1/R if flow is normal to soil strata. The values of R* range from 0.01 to 100 for the synthetic soils. The results show that L is inversely proportional to ln(R*). Larger values of L are indicative of less connected pores and/or more tortuous flow paths. Thus, L was smaller when flow was parallel to soil strata [ln(R*) > 0] than when flow was normal to the soil strata [ln(R*) < 0]. The effect of stratification on L is stronger when the soil is more anisotropic. This means that the difference between Lp and Ln becomes larger when a soil is more stratified.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The relationship between L vs. ln(R*) of the soils with the different levels of heterogeneity. L is the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient; R* is the ratio of correlation length at the direction parallel to flow and that normal to flow; Y = ln(Ks), with Ks being the saturated hydraulic conductivity; and {sigma}2Y is the variance of Y.

 
In Fig. 6, the absolute value of the slope of the regression line increased as the soil became more heterogeneous. This suggests that the effects of soil stratification on L increase when a soil is more heterogeneous. Hence, the value of L is a function of both soil heterogeneity and soil anisotropy.

As many researchers (e.g., Schuh and Cline, 1990; Yates et al., 1992; Kosugi, 1999; de Vos et al., 1999; Schaap and Leij, 2000) have found, the L parameter can be negative (Fig. 6). A negative L may be explained by the expected difference between the configuration of real soil pores and the ideal cylindrical pores whose lengths are proportional to their radii as assumed by Mualem (1976). This difference may introduce some error when Eq. [5b], A(Se,ß,{gamma}), was derived. The second term on the right-hand side of Eq. [5a], SLe, accounts for the effect of flow path tortuosity and pore connectivity on K. Theoretically, L should never be less than zero, which means no effects of flow path tortuosity and pore connectivity. However, the error in A(Se,ß,{gamma}) due to the difference between real soil pores and the ideal cylindrical pores complicates the determination of L. We found that the Mualem (1976) model exhibits larger change in A(Se,ß,{gamma}) than the Burdine (1953) model as Se decreases because of the larger {gamma} value in the former model ({gamma} = 2) than that in the latter model ({gamma} = 1). However, the effect of a larger {gamma} on hydraulic conductivity can be compensated by smaller values of L and ß (Kosugi, 1999). As a result, for the same soil, the L value in the Mualem (1976) model (typically L = 0.5) is smaller than that in the Burdine (1953) model (typically L = 2). It is possible that the Mualem (1976) model overestimates the changes in A(Se,ß,{gamma}) as Se decreases; hence, a smaller L value, even negative, is needed to best describe the hydraulic function. Consequently, an optimized L is actually a lumped parameter that accounts not only for flow path tortuosity and pore connectivity, but for pore configuration as well.

It should be pointed out that the above results were obtained using synthetic sandy soils generated to be Miller-similar and under 2-D flow conditions with constant-head boundary conditions. Further tests of the TCT model are warranted using natural soils under different types of flow conditions.


    SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
A TCT concept is proposed to describe the unsaturated hydraulic properties of anisotropic soils. The TCT concept states that the soil pore connectivity and/or tortuosity are anisotropic. Thus, anisotropic hydraulic properties can be described by extending existing hydraulic functions, such as the Burdine and the Mualem models, in such a way that the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient (L) is a tensor. Numerical experiments in synthetic coarse-textured soils show that soil water retention curves of anisotropic soils are independent of the observation direction but dependent on soil heterogeneity. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of anisotropic soils can differ by several orders of magnitude depending on the observation direction. Soil anisotropy in hydraulic conductivity increases as the soil dries. The TCT model can accurately describe the unsaturated hydraulic functions of anisotropic soils.

The L tensor describes all the effects of soil heterogeneity and spatial correlations on the effective hydraulic conductivity, which need to be specified a priori in the stochastic method (Polmann et al., 1991). The widely used hydraulic functions can be easily extended by allowing L to take different values for the three principal orthogonal coordinate directions of flow. Hence, numerical solutions of the Richards equation can be easily modified to include the TCT concept.

An advantage of using the TCT concept is that the L tensor can be determined by measuring the hydraulic functions at different directions using direct methods or be optimized using inverse methods.

The value of L is a function of both soil heterogeneity and anisotropy and can be negative with current statistical pore size conductivity models. A negative L is attributed to differences between the configuration of real soil pores and the ideal cylindrical pores assumed in its derivation. An optimized L can be thought to be a lumped parameter that accounts, not only for flow path tortuosity and pore connectivity, but for pore configuration as well.

Further research is warranted to evaluate the applicability of the TCT concept to natural soils. This will require measurement of the directional hydraulic conductivity and an investigation of the relationship between the connectivity–tortuosity coefficient and soil anisotropy.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Funding for this research was provided by the Environmental Management Science Program of the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 THEORY
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. L. Ward and Z. F. Zhang
Effective Hydraulic Properties Determined from Transient Unsaturated Flow in Anisotropic Soils
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 913 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
Z. F. Zhang, M. Oostrom, and A.L. Ward
Saturation-Dependent Hydraulic Conductivity Anisotropy for Multifluid Systems in Porous Media
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 925 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. J. Murray, A. L. Ward, and J. L. Wilson
Influence of Clastic Dikes on Vertical Migration of Contaminants at the Hanford Site
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 959 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. Oostrom, M. L. Rockhold, P. D. Thorne, M. J. Truex, G. V. Last, and V. J. Rohay
Carbon Tetrachloride Flow and Transport in the Subsurface of the 216-Z-9 Trench at the Hanford Site
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 971 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. M. Zachara, J. Serne, M. Freshley, F. Mann, F. Anderson, M. Wood, T. Jones, and D. Myers
Geochemical Processes Controlling Migration of Tank Wastes in Hanford's Vadose Zone
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 985 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. A. Woods, R. G. Kachanoski, and M. F. Dyck
Long-Term Solute Transport under Semi-Arid Conditions: Pedon to Field Scale
Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 365 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. F. Dyck, R. G. Kachanoski, and E. de Jong
Spatial Variability of Long-Term Chloride Transport under Semiarid Conditions: Pedon Scale
Vadose Zone J., September 12, 2005; 4(4): 915 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
P. A. C. Raats, Z. F. Zhang, A. L. Ward, and G. W. Gee
The Relative Connectivity-Tortuosity Tensor for Conduction of Water in Anisotropic Unsaturated Soils
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1471 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gee, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity/Relative Permeability
Right arrow Variably Saturated Fluid Flow


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome