|
|
||||||||
a USGS, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025
b USGS, P.O. Box 2230, Idaho Falls, ID 83401
c USGS, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
d USGS, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192
e USGS, 111 Kansas Ave SE, Huron, SD 57350
* Corresponding author (jrnimmo{at}usgs.gov).
Received 18 March 2003.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity DOC, dissolved organic C INEEL, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory INTEC, Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center SDA, Subsurface Disposal Area VZRP, Vadose Zone Research Park
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This paper describes the vadose zone at the INEEL with respect to characteristics important to hydraulic and geochemical transport processes. It emphasizes the southwestern portion of the INEEL where, because of potential contaminants in this area, some of the most intensive subsurface characterization efforts have been done (Fig. 1) . A major source of these contaminants is the INEEL facility known as the Subsurface Disposal Area (SDA) for radioactive and other hazardous waste. As a result, the SDA and its nearby surroundings are the portion of the INEEL that has been most intensively studied with respect to hydraulic and geochemical issues. This paper reflects this emphasis, though where possible we have formulated generalizations to apply to most or all of the INEEL. This review is designed to complement that of Smith (2004). In terms of local-scale geologic framework, it picks up from Smith's presentation of tectonics, volcanism, and basalt characteristics; it emphasizes relatively small-scale features and their role in transport processes. We cover basic issues of transport-relevant characteristics as known mainly from investigations since the 1950s by relatively standard techniques.
|
The vadose zone and aquifer consists of interbedded basalts and sediments (e.g., Smith, 2004). In this paper and elsewhere, the layers of sediments between basalt layers are called sedimentary interbeds. Much of the characterization here directly relates to geologically similar areas throughout the Snake River Plain.
Key issues of vadose zone contaminant transport include (i) travel times to the aquifer, both average or typical values and the range of values to be expected, and (ii) modes of contaminant transport, especially sorption processes. Some of the complicating factors are the hydraulic and geochemical effectiveness of natural barriers; flowpath directions ranging from horizontal to vertical; the diffuse or preferential nature of flow; the chemical nature of contaminants and subsurface media; and the various sources of water now in the subsurface, such as local precipitation, runoff, and horizontal flow from spreading areas or elsewhere. We emphasize the role of sedimentary interbeds, basalts fractured to various degrees, surficial materials, and the connections between the various media. A critical issue throughout is what scale has primary relevance, for example whether heterogeneity at the centimeter scale within sedimentary layers has significant effect relative to heterogeneity at the 10-m scale that would include both basalt and sediments.
| HYDROLOGIC FRAMEWORK |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The geology and hydrology of this site typify the eastern Snake River Plain. The surface vegetation is mostly sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and wheatgrass. There are topographic depressions, normally free of surface water but vulnerable to local flooding. The geologic framework has been characterized on the basis of data from hundreds of boreholes. Many continuous cores up to 550 m in length are available for inspection at the USGS core library (Davis et al., 1997). Recoveries of basalt in most of these cores have been essentially 100%. Recoveries of sediment have ranged from 0 to 100% and are commonly <50% (Hughes, 1993; Burgess et al., 1994). Borehole geophysical data from caliper, neutron, natural
,
, and density measurements have been logged for most boreholes (Bartholomay, 1990c). The vadose zone, about 200 m thick near the SDA, overlies the Eastern Snake River Plain aquifer, which supplies about 2.5 x 109 m3 yr1 of water for agriculture and other uses. Figure 2
illustrates the sequence of basalt interbedded with thin sedimentary units that comprise the vadose zone and aquifer (Anderson and Lewis, 1989). Additional scale drawings and other stratigraphic information are in the works of Barraclough et al. (1976), Rightmire and Lewis (1987b), Anderson et al. (1996), Anderson and Liszewski (1997), and Holdren et al. (2002).
|
The sediments include particles from clay to gravel sized. The soil or surficial sediment typically is a few meters thick. Over much of the INEEL it has undergone little artificial disturbance, not having been used other than for grazing animals. Waste burial at the SDA involved removal of some or all soil to the top of basalt flow group A, emplacement of waste, and backfilling of the trench with the excavated soil. The sedimentary interbeds are named AB, BC, CD, etc. after the basalt flow groups they lie between (Fig. 2). Their depths below land surface vary topographically, but the two most prominent interbeds under the SDA, the BC and CD interbeds, are traditionally labeled with depths of 34 and 73 m, respectively.
Sediments
Origin and General Description
Much of the INEEL sediment was deposited by meltwater discharge and periodic floods along the ancestral channel and floodplain of the Big Lost River during past glacial declines (Hughes, 1993; Rathburn, 1993). Another major part of the surficial sediment and sedimentary interbeds is loess and aeolian material derived from fine alluvial deposits having grain sizes ranging from fine silt to very fine sand. Sediments including large amounts of clay-sized material probably were deposited in small lakes, some of which were formed by lava dams. Clay- to sand-sized sediment also was transported by water and wind into the fractures of underlying basalt flows.
Most of the area of the INEEL is within the Big Lost Trough, an area of sediment accumulation along the channel and floodplain of the Big Lost River and between the Big Lost River sinks and Mud Lake (Fig. 1) (Geslin et al., 2002; Gianniny et al., 1997). Sediment within this trough generally grades from a predominance of sand and gravel near the SDA to mainly clay and silt near Mud Lake. Barraclough et al. (1976) hypothesized that the location of the SDA was in the floodplain of the Big Lost River until about 100000 yrs ago. The presence of gravel in the surficial sediment and interbeds indicates that a watercourse with flow capable of moving gravel-sized grains at least occasionally traversed the area of the SDA during the past few hundred thousand years. Migrations of the Big Lost River probably occurred many times during the geologic past in response to topographic changes produced by basalt eruption.
During periods of volcanic quiescence, sediment accumulated in the topographic depressions of underlying basalt flows to form what are now the sedimentary interbeds. The interbeds closely resemble the surficial sediments in some ways (e.g., mineralogy) and differ significantly in others (e.g., having greater density and more uniform structure). They probably have no significant wormholes or root holes and may be less aggregated than the surficial sediments. Some interbeds are highly stratified; internal layers and lenses can differ substantially in texture, structure, and geochemical composition (e.g., if deposited in different conditions or if baked by a flow of fresh lava).
Two significant periods of loess accumulation in the surficial sediment have been identified: one from about 80000 to 60000 yr ago and one from about 40000 to 10000 yr ago (Forman et al., 1993). The depositional environment of sedimentary interbed AB has at least two different interpretations. According to Hughes (1993), AB sediment is mainly very fine sand and silt deposited in a floodplain environment. According to McElroy et al. (1989), this sediment is primarily loess. At least one period of loess accumulation in interbed AB, probably about 150000 to 140000 yr ago, has been identified (Forman et al., 1993). Hughes (1993) interpreted the sediment of interbed BC as mainly sand and gravel deposited in a braidplain setting in channel systems as wide as 300 m between topographic highs in the basalt. The CD sediment is mainly sand and silt interpreted to have been deposited in low-energy channels and floodplains (Hughes, 1993). The nearly continuous nature of this interbed indicates deposition in a broad, shallow braidplain setting that aggraded to above most of the topographic highs in the basalt (Hughes, 1993). Although interpretations of depositional environments are useful for evaluating overall sediment relations, they are still too generalized to be useful for evaluating the potential for movement of water and wastes.
As determined by sieve analyses, optical scattering, and other methods, grain sizes of surficial and interbed sediments range from clay to pebble sized (Barraclough et al., 1976; Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b; Bartholomay et al., 1989; Davis and Pittman, 1990; Hughes, 1993, Shakofsky, 1995; Perkins and Nimmo, 2000; Perkins, 2003; Winfield, 2003). Most soil and interbed sediment falls within the silt loam textural class, containing about 0 to 27% clay, 55 to 80% silt, and 10 to 35% sand. Fracture- and vesicle-infill sediments generally are finer than interbed sediments because infiltrating water preferentially deposits finer particles in the vesicles and fractures (Rightmire, 1984).
Significant lithologic variations occur within the surficial sediment and sedimentary interbeds as a result of changes in depositional environments through time (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987a, 1987b; Hughes, 1993). Centimeter-scale vertical and horizontal lithologic variations have been investigated for only a few sediment cores. There are discrepancies in the lithologic descriptions by different investigators even for materials from the same boreholes. For example, Rightmire and Lewis (1987a) described the lower part of the CD interbed from one borehole as containing abundant plastic clay, whereas Hughes (1993) described it as sandy silt and slightly silty, fine to coarse sand. Because of these discrepancies and the paucity of detailed descriptions, the role of variations within sedimentary layers in controlling vadose-zone processes cannot yet be fully evaluated.
Weakly developed to well-developed paleosols have been identified in the surficial sediment and sedimentary interbed AB and, although not documented, probably also occur in interbeds BC and CD. Forman et al. (1993) identified paleosols associated with young loess units in two excavations of surficial sediment at the SDA; one of these is thought to represent a prolonged period of pedogenesis, possibly exceeding 20000 yr. These units contain A, B, and C soil horizons, carbonized zones, and abundant clay cutans having a maximum clay concentration of 36%. Carbonized zones represent vegetation that was inundated and baked by lava flows during the geologic past. Carbonate content of these investigated paleosols, outside of the SDA, generally is smaller than 10% but is as large as 20 to 25% in some zones.
Factors such as sedimentary structures, grain size distributions, bulk mineralogy, clay mineralogy, and ion-exchange capacity influence the movement of contaminants. Sedimentary structures in the surficial sediments, interbeds, or both, include, besides the paleosols noted above, cracks formed by hydrocompaction and desiccation, freezethaw features, burrow and rootlet holes, caliche development, horizontal laminations, ripple cross-stratification, planar cross-stratification, lenticular bedding, flaser bedding, rip-up clasts, load casts, and varves (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b; Hughes, 1993).
Areal Extent, Thickness, and Orientation
In and near the SDA, sedimentary sequences vary in thickness from 0 to 12 m, averaging about 1.5 m. Their thicknesses vary in accordance with the topography of underlying basalt flows. The thicknesses and areal extents of the most continuous interbeds near the SDA (AB, BC, and CD) suggest that these units, like the surficial sediment, accumulated for long enough periods of time to fill and overtop most local topographic depressions. Sediment did not accumulate on some local basalt ridges, and sediment accumulation of interbed AB was restricted in areal extent by the northward-sloping surface of the underlying basalt-flow group, which erupted from a vent south of the SDA, near Big Southern Butte (Fig. 1). Processes like this produced sloping surfaces as well as gaps where interbeds pinch out to zero thickness. Near the SDA the interbeds tend to dip in an easterly direction, the BC interbed about 3.8 m km1 and the CD about 4.7 m km1, on average (Anderson and Lewis, 1989).
Mineralogy and Chemical Characteristics
Analyses of bulk mineralogy of INEEL sediments show the presence of quartz, plagioclase feldspar, potassium feldspar, pyroxene, olivine, calcite, dolomite, and clay minerals. Bartholomay (1990b)(p. 11) statistically summarized the previously published bulk mineralogy data by interbed depth for areas throughout the Big Lost Trough. Additional data are in a report by Reed and Bartholomay (1994). In general, quartz and plagioclase feldspar are the most abundant minerals in the sediment in the south and western portions of the Big Lost Trough, while calcite and quartz are the most abundant minerals to the north. Pyroxene and clay minerals also are present in most of the sediment samples from the INEEL. Dolomite is found in most of the sedimentary samples in the northern part of the basin, but is rarely found in the southern part.
Analyses of the clay minerals sampled throughout the INEEL indicate that illite predominates (ranging from 10100% of the clay minerals identified), and that lesser amounts of smectite, mixed-layer illite/smectite, kaolinite, and possibly chlorite are present (Bartholomay et al., 1989; Reed and Bartholomay, 1994). The clay minerals that are present in the system provide sites for sorption or ion exchange with any contaminant-bearing water in the system. These processes would inhibit migration of contaminants to the aquifer.
Abundance of clay minerals in interbed samples from the SDA ranges from 0 to 60% and averages about 20% (Bartholomay, 1990b). Olivine is present in some samples in trace amounts. Calcite also was identified in some samples. Rightmire and Lewis (1987b)(p. 3536) reported trace amounts of iron oxyhydroxides, hematite, siderite and dolomite in some samples. Rightmire and Lewis (unpublished data, 1995) reported one tentative identification of the zeolite mineral chabazite. This lack of zeolite in the system probably precludes ion exchange reactions between contaminants in solution and zeolite minerals.
Mineralogical analyses indicate that most of the carbonate in the system is in the form of calcite (Bartholomay et al., 1989). The calcite generally is attributed to the formation of caliche in the interbeds near the SDA (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b), but is mostly detrital in the northern part of the INEEL. Calcite contents in samples from the SDA range from absent, for most of the samples, to 54%. At the SDA, calcite content larger than 10% was reported for interbeds BC and CD, for surficial sediment, and from a vesicle at about 9 m in a well south of the facility (Fig. 1). The greatest carbonate content in interbed BC is at the base of the interbed (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b).
Immediately below a basalt flow, interbeds are likely to have a baked zone of sedimentary material whose properties may have been altered by exposure to the heat of fresh lava. Many of the sedimentary interbed materials are dark reddish-brown, which may result from dehydration and oxidation of iron-rich minerals enhanced by heat from the overlying lava flows. This coloration also may result from oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric iron during the weathering of olivine and augite at the time that the interbeds were exposed at the land surface to an oxygenated soil atmosphere (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b).
Hydraulic Properties of Surficial Sediments
The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K) and water retention of the surficial sediments at the INEEL are typical of a soil in which structural features such as aggregation and macropores have evolved over time, as shown by Shakofsky (1995) and Nimmo et al. (1999). Hydraulic and other properties of surficial sediments have also been measured and reported by Barraclough et al. (1976), McElroy and Hubbell (1990), Borghese (1991), and Shakofsky (1995).
At some locations, especially where INEEL facilities have been constructed, soil properties have been substantially altered by mechanical disturbances. Typically such disturbance reduces the effect of large pores and damages or destroys the natural soil horizons and other stratification. These alterations can greatly influence the subsurface hydrology. Although soil disturbed in this way occupies only a small fraction of the INEEL, it is important to contaminant hydrology because it surrounds most of the contaminant sources.
Figure 3 gives a basic characterization of selected measured properties of disturbed and undisturbed soil, and illustrates the distinguishable horizons of the undisturbed profile, at a location north of and adjacent to the SDA. Nimmo et al. (1999) and Shakofsky (1995) give additional information about the soil horizons and related data, including particle and aggregate size distributions. Distinct horizon development in the undisturbed profile is clear. The disturbed soil is more homogeneous; the relatively smooth profiles of the aggregate distribution, clay content, and carbonate content portray an absence of natural layers. Probably as a result of this homogeneity, water content in the disturbed profile is also more uniform with depth. Disturbance, in this case construction of a simulated waste trench, has created an essentially unlayered, homogenized soil of unconsolidated sediments with an increased porosity.
|
Measured unsaturated properties reported by Nimmo et al. (1999) characterize both undisturbed and disturbed soil near the SDA. The drying retention curves in Fig. 4 show the air-entry very near zero matric pressure, an abrupt drop to a bend between 10 and 30 kPa, and a nearly flat tail beyond the bend. They differ little between undisturbed and disturbed soils. The shapes are typical of structured surface soils, not of repacked samples. The most obvious disturbance-related distinction is that there is more spread among the undisturbed curves, indicative of layering like most of the results in Fig. 4. There also is more horizontal heterogeneity in the undisturbed soil, evident from the typically greater spread for the paired samples from the same depth, which came from boreholes 2 to 3 m apart. The measured wetting retention curves suggest essentially the same disturbance-related generalizations as the drying curves. For the same samples, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity measurements by several methods show some measurable effect of landfill-construction disturbance. In the undisturbed medium, there is greater spread, indicative of greater heterogeneity, and a tendency toward greater sensitivity of K to water content. The various property measurements imply a broader pore-size distribution for undisturbed soil. It is likely that the excavation and replacement of soil both destroys large pores and breaks up aggregates, reducing the breadth of the pore-size distribution.
|
Drying water retention measurements for four samples from the perimeter of the SDA reported by McElroy and Hubbell (1990) fall within or close to the range of measurements in Fig. 4b. The curves show a somewhat more gradual decline in water content (
) with decreasing matric pressure (
), like those of the more water-retentive samples in Fig. 4a.
Hydraulic Properties of Sedimentary Interbeds
The hydraulic properties of interbeds tend to be like those of the surficial sediments except for systematic differences such as smaller wet-range hydraulic conductivity resulting from greater bulk density. Because of their compacted structure with few macropores, interbed sediments are also likely to retain more water after episodes of drainage. Hydraulic properties of interbed sediments have been measured and reported by Barraclough et al. (1976), McElroy and Hubbell (1990), McCarthy and McElroy (1995), Perkins and Nimmo (2000), Leecaster (2002), Perkins (2003), and Winfield (2003) (Table 1). Sampling locations are near the SDA, near the Vadose Zone Research Park (VZRP), and between the VZRP and the Big Lost River as shown in Fig. 1. Many of the samples in these studies contain <50% sand-sized or larger particles, and little or no gravel. Coarse materials are known to exist as a result of high-energy flow events in ancestral channels, although they may be underrepresented in the available data. This underrepresentation may reflect a sampling bias, as finer materials are more easily recovered by the techniques used in the retrieval of deep cores. The coarsest samples analyzed for hydraulic properties contain >90% sand and as much as 7% gravel (Perkins, 2000).
|
Perkins and Nimmo (2000) measured a detailed vertical profile of hydraulic properties of the BC interbed at one location near the SDA. At this location, a 5-m-thick layer of silt loam is overlain by 5 m of sand with intermittent gravel lenses that are likely associated with an ancestral channel of the Big Lost River. Figure 5 shows particle size distributions, water retention characteristics, and hydraulic conductivity curves for the two extreme textures at this location. Vertical variation in sediment texture also illustrates the difference in depositional environments over time. Horizontal variability of sediments likely plays a significant role in vertical and horizontal flow behavior. Recent hydraulic property measurements on samples from the vicinity of the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) (Perkins, 2003; Winfield, 2003) provide a transect of data that illustrate horizontal variability for one area (Fig. 6) . An example based on data from five boreholes is shown in Figure 7 . Most of the samples have silt loam texture. Horizontal variability is relatively minimal but is more pronounced in areas traversed by the ancestral Big Lost River. The subsurface is more structurally complex, in terms of number of interbeds and variation in dip angles, near the INTEC than near the SDA, so it is more difficult to correlate interbeds over significant distances. Anderson (1991) identified 23 basalt flow groups and 15 to 20 interbeds in the vicinity of the INTEC.
|
|
|
Basalt flows and other volcanic deposits combine into basalt flow groups, each of which is a complex assemblage of overlapping flows and deposits related to a single eruption. A basalt flow group comprises several, perhaps hundreds, of distinct basalt flows that occurred in a time interval brief enough that little or no sediment accumulated between them.
Basalt rock varies greatly in the degree to which it is fractured. Where fractures are small in aperture and predominantly intercrystalline, the basalt is called dense or massive. At the other extreme, where fractures are so pronounced and abundant that the rock is broken into individual particles, it is called rubble, a term which is taken also to include other particulate volcanic material such as scoria. The term fractured basalt refers either to the broad middle range of material that is hydraulically dominated by interconnected fractures, or to the basalts as a whole.
Mineralogy and Chemical Characteristics
Most basalt flows at the INEEL have the chemical characteristics of both tholeittic and alkali olivine basalts. These basalts generally are medium to dark gray and range from vesicular, having elongated vesicles up to 4 cm long, to dense.
Typical basalt samples consist mainly of plagioclase feldspar (averaging An65, the composition of labradorite), pyroxene (tentatively identified as augite), and olivine (Fo50 to Fo90) and contain lesser amounts of ilmenite, magnetite, hematite, and accessory apatite (Kuntz et al., 1980; Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b; Knobel et al., 1997). Chemical compositions of selected basalt samples at the INEEL were presented in reports by Kuntz and Dalrymple (1979), Knobel et al. (1995)(2001), Reed et al. (1997), and Colello et al. (1998). Stout and Nicholls (1977) stated that the augite contains 18.8% CaO2 and that opaque minerals constitute between 7 and 21% of the rock. With the exception of some basalt flows at Craters of the Moon (about 200018000 yr old) and basalt flows associated with Cedar Butte (about 420000 yr old), there are no significant differences in chemical or mineralogical composition related to age or geographic location among basalt flows of the eastern Snake River Plain (Knobel et al., 1997).
Nature of Fractures
In general, the number of fractures and the widths of their apertures are much greater near the top and bottom of a basalt flow and are greatest along the top surface. Knutson et al. (1992) described a range of typical aperture widths measured from outcrops at the INEEL of from 0.0005 to 0.0025 m; however, aperture widths may range from several micrometers to several meters (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b).
Rightmire and Lewis (1987a) described fractures in basalt core samples from the SDA that range from those having fresh surfaces to those containing abundant sediment infill. Fractures having fresh surfaces most likely are dead-end fractures that transmit little, if any, water (Wood and Norrell, 1996; Magnuson and Sondrup, 1998). Fractures containing sediment infill or coatings probably are interconnected fractures that periodically transmit large quantities of water. Sediment in these fractures ranges from clay to sand sized. Sediment coloration indicates a wide range of minerals and depositional environments and includes hues of tan, brown, red, gray, orange, yellow, and green. Many of the deposits are calcareous. Additional fracture coatings consist of amorphous silica, precipitates consisting of calcite and mixed-layer illite/smectite clays, and, possibly zeolites (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987a).
Fractures and vesicles commonly are coated with fine-grained sediment infill and sometimes with secondary minerals consisting of calcite, clays, and zeolites (Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b; Morse and McCurry, 1997). Fractures within and contacts between individual basalt flows provide a complex network of potential vertical and horizontal pathways for the movement of water and wastes within the vadose zone and the aquifer.
Barraclough et al. (1976) noted that at the contact between basalt and sedimentary layers, the permeable openings into the basalt are partially filled by sediment. Rightmire (1984)(p. 32) observed that "... sedimentary lining and filling of fractures is the result of water-borne sedimentation. Layers of oriented clay particles overlain by disoriented coarser material suggest a series of minor recharge events followed by a major recharge event to fill the fractures." A layer of basalt in which the fractures are filled with fine sediments may have particularly low hydraulic conductivity.
Rubble
Rubble zones are common along the rapidly cooled margins of basalt flows. Rubble and scoria are widely distributed in the vadose zone and aquifer at the INEEL. For example, Magnuson and Sondrup (1998) described a rubble zone across the SDA at a depth of about 60 m.
Smith (2004) described rubble zones as layers of solidified blocks that fall from the front of an advancing lava flow, which then overrides them. Welhan et al. (2002a) described one type as "a highly porous and permeable zone" that is "supported within and on the upper crust of a lobe." According to Welhan et al. (2002a)( 2002b), they occur prominently and thickly in the uppermost portion of a lava flow. Geist et al. (2002) said they mostly occur at the upper crust of lava flows. Smith (2004) noted that each basalt flow has a rubble zone at its base. Similarly, but with a different process of formation in mind, Geist et al. (2002) noted that they exist in the scoriaceous lower crusts of some flows. The potential for scoria is greatest near a vent, for example in basalt-flow group C near the SDA (Anderson and Liszewski, 1997).
The thickness of rubble zones is usually about 1 m (Smith, 2004). Welhan et al. (2002b) estimated that the typical thickness is <0.2 m for the rubble itself, and likely from 1 to 1.5 m for rubble plus the most densely fractured upper crust.
Important properties of rubble zones include their porosity, which can be as high as 50% (Smith, 2004). Their hydraulic conductivity is likely to be similar to that of gravel, and could easily exceed 1 cm s1.
Hydraulic Properties of Basalts
The hydraulic properties of the basalts have been determined using approaches that include single-well aquifer tests, laboratory measurements, large-scale infiltration tests, inverse modeling, and forward modeling.
Based on estimates from single-well aquifer tests of 114 wells at and near the INEEL (Anderson et al., 1999) the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the basalts ranges from about 3.5 x 106 to 11.3 cm s1. It is largest for fractured basalt and near-vent volcanic deposits and smallest for dikes, dense basalt, and altered basalt. About two-thirds of these estimates are >0.03 cm s1, and about one-third are >0.35 cm s1. The median is 0.18 cm s1.
Preliminary results of a subregional steady-state model (USGS MODFLOW 2000) applied to flow in the Snake River Plain aquifer at the INEEL provide large-scale estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity that range from 0.03 to as high as 3.7 cm s1 (Ackerman, personal communication, 2003). These values represent bulk hydraulic conductivity estimates that effectively minimized differences between simulated and measured heads using four hydrogeologic units to represent the aquifer across an area of 4100 km2.
The unsaturated hydraulic properties of the fractured basalts have been represented by the effective properties approach (Magnuson and Sondrup, 1998), assuming that the fracture network is equivalent to a high-permeability, low-porosity medium (Becker et al., 1998). Magnuson (1995) determined the anisotropy, fracture porosity, the longitudinal dispersivity, and Brooks and Corey (1964) parameters for unsaturated water retention and hydraulic conductivity by inverse modeling to data collected during the Large Scale Infiltration Test (Dunnivant et al., 1998). These results indicated saturated hydraulic conductivities ranging from 3.0 x 104 (vertical) to 9.0 x 102 cm s1 (horizontal) using an assumed fracture porosity of 0.05 and a fracture aperture of 0.001 m. Kwicklis compared these results (Rousseau et al., 2004) with a theoretically derived estimate based on the capillary rise equation adapted for apertures of parallel-plate fractures (Kwicklis and Healy, 1993) and concluded that an interconnected fracture density of 34 fractures per cubic meter would result in an effective continuum hydraulic conductivity of 2.8 cm s1, many times larger than estimates derived from the inverse modeling approach. The large range of these estimates reflects uncertainty inherent from the poorly understood nature of unsaturated flow in fractures, and underlines the difficulty and possible inadequacy of the effective properties approach.
As expected from the basic character of basalt formations, there is substantial large- and small-scale anisotropy in INEEL basalts. Estimated ratios of horizontal/vertical permeability range from about 3:1 to 300:1 (Barraclough et al., 1976; Magnuson, 1995; Magnuson and Sondrup, 1998). The subregional aquifer flow model described previously indicates that this ratio may be as high as 7000:1, based on optimization routines used in the MODFLOW 2000 model to minimize residual heads (Ackerman, personal communication, 2003).
Estimates of the effective porosity of the basalts vary widely with sample location, measurement methods, and sample scale. Void spaces in the basalts are most prominent in interflow zones and their associated rubble, fractures, joints, and vesicles (Hughes et al., 1999, Fig. 12). The effective porosity of fractured basalt generally is greater than that of dense basalt. Estimates of the effective porosity range from 0.05 to 0.25 (Nace et al., 1975; Barraclough et al., 1967; Robertson et al., 1974; Robertson, 1974; Bishop, 1991; Garabedian, 1992; Ackerman, 1995). Large-scale estimates, derived from subregional transient-flow model simulations of the aquifer at the INEEL, indicate effective porosities that range from 0.07 to 0.24 (Ackerman, personal communication, 2003).
| DYNAMICS OF VADOSE ZONE FLOW |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Big Lost River is the principal stream within the INEEL and a major source of recharge to the Snake River Plain aquifer. Robertson (1974)(p. 26) noted that recharge from the Big Lost River is the "biggest hydrologic variable" in determining the future behavior of waste constituents in the aquifer. But the Big Lost River has been modified so that its hydrologic influence is not limited to the processes occurring within its channel. To minimize the likelihood of floods at INEEL facilities, a diversion dam was constructed on the river in 1958 and enlarged in 1984. Since 1965, a large proportion of the river's flow has been diverted into a series of four infiltration basins, called spreading areas, which occupy a total area of about 12 km2 and have an estimated total capacity of 2.8 x 107 m3. Barraclough et al. (1967) estimated characteristic ponded infiltration rates of 2.5 x 106 m s1 (0.22 m d1) for the first spreading area and 9.1 x 106 m s1 (0.79 m d1) for the second. The average annual flow into the spreading areas from 1965 through 1999 was 4.9 x 107 m3. In some years (e.g., 19781980, 19881994, and 20002003), no water was diverted. During the wet years of 1982 through 1985 approximately two-thirds of the Big Lost River flow that entered the INEEL was diverted to the spreading areas (Pittman et al., 1988).
The SDA has been flooded in 1962, 1969, and 1982 by local runoff from rapid spring thaws (Holdren et al., 2002). Heavy rainfall and melting snow within the SDA have also introduced water into trenches and pits.
Flow within Surficial Sediments
Local infiltration from rainfall, snowmelt, and runoff initially moves downward. If the infiltration is uniform for a large enough area, it can be treated as one-dimensional vertical flow. Infiltrating water can move quickly down to some depth, perhaps a few centimeters or meters, depending on macropores and soil layers, and then move more slowly. Over most of the INEEL, most of the infiltration eventually exits at the soil surface by evapotranspiration. Water flows and redistributes differently in disturbed and undisturbed soil.
Figure 8 illustrates soil water behavior in response to 24-h flood-infiltration experiments reported by Nimmo et al. (1999). Water-content profiles were measured by the neutron-scattering method in separate, identical experiments in disturbed and undisturbed soil. Figure 8a and 8c show water behavior during the infiltration period for the undisturbed and disturbed soil. In the undisturbed soil, the infiltrating wetting front (Fig. 8a) is diffuse in character. The profile behind the wetting front has a slowly increasing water content. In the disturbed soil (Fig. 8c) the wetting front is sharp, with high and fairly uniform water content behind. In both cases the maximum measured water contents are less than the porosity of the media, as expected because of air trapping during infiltration. A clear distinction is that water initially moves to greater depths faster in the undisturbed soil, for example, reaching about 1.7 m in 6 h while in the disturbed soil it reaches only 0.5 m. This behavior is wholly consistent with the expectation that high-conductance macropores would be common in natural soil but far less abundant in severely disturbed soil. Figure 8b and 8d show redistribution, with the surface covered to suppress additional infiltration and evapotranspiration, during 76 d after the infiltration period. In the disturbed soil (Fig. 8d) redistribution closely follows the constant-area-rectangle model that frequently applies in homogeneous soils when evaporation is negligible (e.g., Jury et al., 1991). Water appears to move easily and uniformly downwards. It reaches the 3-m depth in about 32 d and shows no evidence of having stopped, even after 76 d. In the undisturbed soil (Fig. 8a and 8b), on the other hand, redistribution does not follow the rectangle model and appears to encounter an impediment to flow at the 2-m depth. In the disturbed but not the undisturbed soil, the infiltrated water appears to remain within the measured profile. In the undisturbed medium, because the soil was covered, the substantial water loss probably does not result from evaporation. More likely it results from horizontal flow that removes water from the range of neutron detection, a process that also could be enhanced by an impeding layer at 2 m. Numerical simulations of this field experiment showed Richards' equation to be consistent with the sharp wetting front and rectangular redistribution in the disturbed soil, but not with the nearly simultaneous wetting within the upper 2 m of the undisturbed soil.
|
Where the soil has been disturbed by such operations as excavation and replacement, the destruction of layers and macropores has significant hydrologic influence. Water moves relatively freely and uniformly to deeper depths. Although the Nimmo et al. (1999) experiments showed no apparent depth limit to the vulnerability of disturbed soil to significant water content increase, the effects of the 24-h flood were significantly attenuated over the days required for water to reach depths exceeding 2 m. Normally, evaporation would not be suppressed, so the increase at these depths would be even less. Although disturbance destroys layers and macropores, which have opposing hydraulic effects, the disturbance may have the net effect of increasing deep percolation because of the loss of impeding layers that otherwise would act to hold water close enough to the land surface for removal by evapotranspiration.
Flow within Sedimentary Interbeds
Flow behavior in sedimentary interbeds varies widely both seasonally and sporadically as water content and hydraulic conductivity vary. At least to some degree, sedimentary interbeds are likely to impede vertical flow and to cause preferential flow from basalt fractures to become more diffuse. The observed perching of water in and above interbeds supports this.
The interbeds probably have less macropore flow within them than the surficial sediments or basalts, but their layered structure may be conducive to funneled or unstable flow (discussed further below under Flow in the Integrated Vadose Zone). Laboratory measurements show that layers of particularly low hydraulic conductivity commonly exist within interbeds, often near sediment basalt contacts (Barraclough et al., 1976; Perkins and Nimmo, 2000; Perkins, 2003), and that saturated hydraulic conductivity can vary by several orders of magnitude within an interbed. Thus, it is likely that, to some degree, they cause vertical and horizontal preferential flow. If fast pathways are common and operative to a significant degree within interbeds, they would significantly influence contaminant transport, such as by lessening adsorptive processes.
Whether the interbeds on the whole act more as barriers to downward flow or as zones of substantial preferential flow is not yet clearly known. Compared with the surficial sediments, there is much less direct evidence concerning flow behavior in the interbeds, mainly because it is difficult to investigate by field experiments that isolate the effects of interbeds from the system as a whole. Depending on the magnitude and prevalence of critical hydraulic processes within these layers, they may retard or accelerate contaminant transport, dilute or fail to dilute contaminants, and establish the dominant movement as vertical or horizontal.
Flow within Basalts
Flow within the basalts is dominated by macropore flow through fractures; the basalt matrix is sometimes assumed impermeable, which for many purposes is likely an adequate approximation. A large body of evidence, including that of the Large-Scale Infiltration Test (Dunnivant et al., 1998), indicates that when the basalt fractures are filled, they can conduct rapidly, perhaps meters per day or faster. Some fractures become filled from wetting events that might occur as often as once or more per year. There is also evidence that some fractures, especially ones with dead ends, do not conduct significant flow, or at least do not allow significant downward flow (Dunnivant et al., 1998). Little is known about the processes or rates of flow in parts of basalt in which all fractures are unsaturated. A common assumption, possibly valid for some purposes, is that such flow is negligible compared with episodic flow through filled macropores.
Flow within Rubble Zones
Flow in rubble zones appears essential to explain the fast, long-range, horizontal vadose zone flow which is increasingly confirmed by observational evidence, such as the field tracer experiments of Nimmo et al. (2002).
That rubble zones can conduct large water fluxes horizontally when wet is established in one way through their effect within the aquifer. The great horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the Snake River Plain aquifer has been credited to what are termed interflow zones. Welhan et al. (2002a) described a Type I interflow zone as a combination of highly porous and permeable upper crust and rubble that is commonly observed on lava lobe surfaces. This type of structure, in whole or in part, is a rubble zone. A Type II interflow zone, according to Welhan et al., is a network of tension fractures in inflated pahoehoe, and thus would not normally consist of rubble.
Because vadose zone perching in response to unusually intense infiltration commonly occurs in basalt as well as sedimentary layers, there is a clear possibility for rubble zones to become effectively saturated from time to time, and so to constitute an extremely conductive layer. Some of the rubble-zone formation mechanisms (e.g., development along individual lobes of basalt; Welhan, 2002b, Fig. 2) would not likely create a conductive zone that exists over distances of 1 km and more. Thus the large-scale tracer evidence of Nimmo et al. (2002) supports the possibility of rubble-zone formation mechanisms with large-scale continuity (e.g., rubble forming the base of all basalt flows) under at least some circumstances.
Flow in the Integrated Vadose Zone
Different modes of flow, which may be organized into the two broad categories of diffuse flow (quantifiable with Darcy's Law and Richards' equation) and preferential flow (more narrowly focused and usually faster than diffuse flow) occur within the INEEL vadose zone.
If diffuse flow were the only category of significance, transport in the vadose zone would proceed according to traditional assumptions that it is slow (a few meters per year or less) and predominantly vertical. Slow transport results from typically low values of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Vertical transport is likely if the main transport mechanisms are dominated by gravity, as opposed to pressure or concentration gradients, and if the subsurface is effectively homogeneous within each horizontal plane. These generalizations are likely to be applicable some or all of the time in some portions of the geologically diverse INEEL vadose zone, for example where soil has been artificially homogenized, as described above.
Preferential flow transports water and contaminants horizontally to adjacent regions or vertically to the aquifer far sooner than might be predicted based on bulk medium properties and Richards' equation. Another important effect of preferential flow is that a relatively small fraction of the subsurface medium interacts with the contaminants, which limits adsorption and other attenuating processes. Three basic types of preferential flow are macropore, funneled, and unstable (or fingered) flow. Macropore flow has been mentioned above in terms of large soil pores and fractures in basalt. Funneled flow occurs in connection with contrasting layers or lenses, where flow deflected in direction causes a local increase in water content and therefore in hydraulic conductivity and flux. Unstable flow most commonly occurs where water enters a contrasting layer and local instabilities on the plane of contact generate fingers of high water content and flux. It may persist within that layer for several weeks or more. Unstable flow has at least two complications that do not apply to macropore or funneled flow. First, it is not tied to particular permanent features of the medium. Second, the preferentiality of unstable flow changes dynamically, for example by growth in finger width as flow progresses. Theories of unstable flow in terms of scaling and other concepts have been developed by Raats (1973), Parlange and Hillel (1976), Glass et al. (1989), and Hendrickx and Yao (1996).
Information on the particular rate, direction, and mode of flow in the INEEL vadose zone comes from diverse sources, that relate to this problem with varying degrees of directness. Tracers in the form of solutes or pulses of water fairly directly indicate flow rate and direction (e.g., Dunnivant et al., 1998; Nimmo et al., 2002). Often the tracers used in such studies preexist in the environment from natural or artificial causes (e.g., Cecil et al., 1992; Busenberg et al., 2001; 1993). Measurements of water content and matric pressure with time (e.g., Davis and Pittman, 1990; Pittman, 1989; Pittman, 1995; Perkins, 2000; and McElroy and Hubbell, 2003) provide data for calculation of fluxes, and through changes with time may indicate fluxes directly. The dynamics of variably saturated conditions (e.g., perching, mounding of water on the aquifer, fluctuation of measured water levels) can suggest vadose zone flow rates and directions (e.g., Orr, 1999).
Processes of Vertical Flow
In the general case of a stratified vadose zone, contacts between layers that contrast in hydraulic properties (whether obvious rocksediment contacts or subtler textural contrasts within sediments or within porous rock) impede vertical flow by various mechanisms. When water moves down from a coarse to a fine layer, as from coarse sand to silt, if both layers are near saturation, the fine layer has smaller hydraulic conductivity. Therefore, flow slows when it reaches the fine layer. If the coarse layer is nearly saturated, but the fine layer is initially fairly dry, it is possible for flow to be initially dominated by the sorptive nature of the fine medium, which acts to suck water out of the coarse material. In the latter case the fine layer does not impede flow until more uniformly saturated conditions occur. Where a fine layer overlies a coarse layer, water moving downward is impeded under many conditions. When coarse material is dry, it has an extremely small hydraulic conductivity; thus it tends not to admit water into the pores and exhibits a somewhat self-perpetuating resistance to flow. Water breaks into the coarse layer if the pressure at the layer contact builds to the point that the water-entry pressure (the minimum water pressure needed to fill an empty pore) of some of the large pores is exceeded. This can generate instabilities, as discussed above. Stable or not, water flowing into the pores of the coarse medium drastically increases its hydraulic conductivity. Stable flow through layers where fine overlies coarse is slower than it would be if both layers had the properties of the fine medium. Miller and Gardner (1962) demonstrated this effect experimentally. Thus, the boundaries between any adjacent layers (e.g., sandy and silty layers within interbeds) may retard flow under unsaturated conditions.
A thin surficial layer of small hydraulic conductivity, like the soil at the INEEL, can limit downward flow to the point of being the dominant influence on flow through the sequence. Stothoff (1997) considered a granular medium above fractured bedrock, similar to much of the INEEL vadose zone. The bedrock admits water only under nearly saturated conditions. Stothoff's interpretation assumes the fractures are of greater-than-microscopic width and the rock is otherwise impermeable. The thickness of the granular layer strongly influences the fraction of average precipitation that flows into the bedrock (and presumably further, to the aquifer); a thin alluvial layer more easily becomes saturated to the layer contact and hence more frequently permits deep percolation.
Once water moves through the surficial sediment, or directly into basalt where sediment is absent, vertical water movement through the vadose zone is largely controlled by fractures in the basalt and by the smaller hydraulic conductivity of the interbed sediments. The travel time from the land surface to the top of the first basalt layer may range from a few days to a few years. Travel time through a saturated fractured basalt layer tens of meters thick could be from days to weeks (Dunnivant et al., 1998; Nimmo et al., 2002), while flow through unsaturated fractures is likely to be slower (Tokunaga and Wan, 1997; Su et al., 1999).
When downward flow through basalt fractures reaches the top of a sedimentary interbed, the flow can move in various ways. This flow, like flow through the surficial layers, can be a combination of diffuse and preferential flow. It is probably slower than flow through fractured basalt. Because interbed characteristics are different from those of the surficial sediment and because evapotranspiration at a basaltinterbed contact is insignificant, the flow at these contacts in some ways differs markedly from flow through the surficial sediment.
At the bottom of a sedimentary layer, at the contact with the basalt, water accumulates until the sediment is wet enough to allow breakthrough into one or more fractures, or until the wetted portion of the contact broadens enough to include the entrance to a fracture that is already an active downward conduit. Sometimes this accumulation causes perching just above the basalt contact (Bishop, 1996). Another flow-inhibiting process at the base of a sedimentary layer may result from the lower porosity of the basalt and the distances between its fractures. Barraclough et al. (1976) described this process, noting, "At the contact, perhaps only 10% of the basalt surface is composed of permeable openings, and these are partially filled by sediment. The other 90% is virtually impermeable. This, in effect, provides a thin skin that is estimated to have one-tenth or less of the permeability of the sediments alone." That water commonly perches in and near interbeds suggests that, in at least some circumstances, the interbeds conduct downward flow much more slowly than the basalts.
Recharge
Some fraction of infiltration becomes deep percolation, which is likely to become aquifer recharge. The depth that water must reach for virtual certainty that it will continue downward may be the depth to the fractured basalt, or it may be approximated as the maximum depth at which plant roots are active. At most locations in the INEEL, this depth is a few meters. In the disturbed area of the SDA, where grasses are the dominant vegetation, the depth of active roots is about 2 m.
Diffuse areal recharge, that is, recharge that derives from immediate infiltration of rainfall and snowmelt without collection into surface-water bodies, on the eastern Snake River Plain generally is expected to be small. For an estimated average rate of downward flow, if it is gravity-driven below a certain depth, K at the field water content of that depth can indicate the downward flux density (Nimmo et al., 1994). If water content is essentially constant at a depth of a few meters, at about 0.23 m in the undisturbed and 0.20 m in the disturbed soil, then the K results of Nimmo et al. (1999) with the assumption of gravity-driven flow, indicate about 1 mm or less of deep drainage per year. This is the same order of magnitude as the estimates of 3.6 to 11 mm yr1 that Cecil et al. (1992) obtained by tracer and Darcy-based methods. Assuming there are no losses of water between 3 m and the water table, the range of estimates from these two studies would directly represent recharge rates. Assuming an average water content of about 0.2, the corresponding rates of convective transport would be 5 to 50 mm yr1. Estimates of this magnitude do not explain the findings of contamination at considerable depths (Humphrey et al., 1982; Laney et al., 1988), suggesting that there are operative flow modes outside of those assumed in this analysis, or significant recharge that does not fall in this category.
Topographically focused recharge may occur from major surface-water features as discussed above, and also from local runoff accumulating in low-lying areas. The SDA, for example, is in a topographic depression. Rapid infiltration of ponded surface water causes recharge that locally affects water levels in the Snake River Plain aquifer. Pittman et al. (1988) observed that the water table in the vicinity of the SDA rose as much as 4.9 m during 1982 through 1985 in response to recharge from surface water diverted to the spreading areas. The rapid downward convective transport (exceeding 20 m d1) reported by Nimmo et al. (2002) also underlines the importance of this type of recharge.
Perching
Perching, an accumulation of water in a region of the vadose zone such that it becomes locally saturated even though there is unsaturated material below, commonly occurs at the INEEL. It usually results from a large flux of water that encounters a severely impeding layer. It may be a temporary or permanent feature, depending on the nature of the medium, the prevailing hydrologic conditions, and the effect of artificial modifications, as discussed above in terms of the processes of vertical flow. In most cases perched zones are temporary, persisting until horizontal and vertical flow spreads them out enough to leave the porous materials unsaturated.
Several studies (Barraclough et al., 1976; Rightmire and Lewis, 1987b; Anderson and Lewis, 1989) have shown that water episodically accumulates in perched layers that typically persist for a few months. Perched zones commonly extend horizontally for hundreds or thousands of meters. The artificial infiltration of wastewater has created perched zones that have persisted for several years (Orr, 1999). Barraclough et al. (1976)(p. 51) noted the presence of perched water in several boreholes within the SDA. They observed that an extensive zone of saturated to nearly saturated basalt existed beneath the SDA. The source of water was not known, but they believed that thin perched-water zones could represent long-term local accumulation of percolating precipitation or more recent accumulation from the 1969 flood at the SDA. The tracer experiment of Nimmo et al. (2002) showed that substantial perching of water under the SDA and elsewhere results from the percolation of water from the spreading areas. Cecil et al. (1991) analyzed water levels in wells and measured water content profiles, showing that perching can take place within both sediments and basalts, and suggested that specific layer contrasts that cause perching at the INEEL might include contacts between (i) basalt flows and sedimentary interbeds; (ii) basalt flows and baked zones; (iii) fractured basalt and dense, unfractured basalt; and (iv) fractured basalt with and without sediments or authigenic mineral deposits filling the fractures.
Perching complicates a contamination problem in several ways. The high water content of a perched zone causes greater hydraulic conductivity and potentially faster transport through the three-dimensional system. The main effect is not a direct increase in vertical flux because the increase in effective vertical hydraulic conductivity is offset by a diminished vertical hydraulic gradient within the perched water. (Vertical flux within and below the perched water cannot be faster than the vertical flux above the perched water or the perched water would have drained). Horizontally, however, there may be greatly increased flow. New and different processes may significantly affect contaminant transport in a perched zone. Reduced aeration, for example, may affect biochemical processes. At the scale of the entire stratified vadose zone, perching may significantly increase anisotropy. Horizontally for considerable distances the hydraulic conductivity might be 1 cm s1 or so, as for a saturated gravel. At the same time, however, vertical flow might be limited by an unsaturated layer having vertical hydraulic conductivity ten or more orders of magnitude less, as for basalt without water in its fractures.
Horizontal Flow
Water movement in the INEEL vadose zone may be predominantly vertical, but it is significantly retarded and diverted by features of the basalts and sediments. Horizontal water movement through the basaltsediment sequence is largely controlled by the great conductances of basalt fractures and rubble. In the saturated zone, these features provide the main conduits for groundwater flow. In the vadose zone they have the potential to channel perched water over large distances within short periods of time. Fast horizontal flow generally requires an impeding layer below the zone of horizontal flow, as the situation is essentially a case of funneled flow, as explained above. Rapid, high-volume infiltration is likely to greatly enhance the magnitude of vadose zone horizontal flow.
A variety of evidence demonstrates horizontal vadose zone flow and its possibilities. At a modest scale, Rightmire and Lewis (1987a) found grout cement below the BC level in a well for which the nearest likely source of such material was a well 168 m away, the likely pathway being a rubble zone beneath the BC interbed. Nimmo et al. (2002) reported tracer evidence of horizontal flow rates >14 m d1 and extending for more than 1 km in the vadose zone in or above both the BC and CD interbeds. The pattern of detections and nondetections in sampled perched-water wells showed the horizontal spreading was not uniform with direction. This essentially confirmed the hypothesis of Rightmire and Lewis (1987b)(p. 83), who noted anomalously light isotopic content in water samples from perched water samples at the SDA, indicative of a water source at an altitude higher than the surface of the Snake River Plain, as evidence for accumulation of water as a perched mound on the CD interbed which moves horizontally to the SDA from the location of the Big Lost River or spreading areas. For this to occur as rapidly as observed in the tracer experiment of Nimmo et al. (2002), it is likely that the interbeds caused perching that extended upward into some portion of the overlying basalt. Tracer found under the SDA was in the CD interbed, while tracer found by Nimmo et al. at a comparable distance at the site of the Large Scale Infiltration Test (Wood and Norrell, 1996) was in the BC interbed. In both cases this is consistent with the average dip of these interbeds with respect to particular areas of tracer application.
Horizontal transport for longer distances is also possible. Anderson and Lewis (1989)(p. 20) noted that the potential for horizontal flow away from the SDA along the east-sloping surface of the CD interbed is large, highlighting as relevant features the distribution and characterization of flow contacts, fractures, and vesicles, and the lithology of major sedimentary interbeds.
Water moving horizontally is likely to migrate toward depressions at sedimentbasalt contacts. Anderson and Lewis (1989)(p. 38 and 47) described the sedimentbasalt contact on the top of basalt-flow group C in the western part of the SDA as having interbed thickness changing abruptly from 0 on a basalt ridge to more than 6 m in an adjacent depression. Rightmire and Lewis (1987a) suggested, on the basis of carbonate encapsulating clay pellets covered with desiccation cracks present in interbed B