VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjaergaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schjønning, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kjaergaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schjønning, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kjaergaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schjønning, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Batch Studies
Right arrow Colloids
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Published in Vadose Zone Journal 3:403-412 (2004)
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

SPECIAL SECTION: COLLOIDS AND COLLOID-FACILITATED TRANSPORT OF CONTAMINANTS IN SOILS

Water-Dispersible Colloids

Effects of Measurement Method, Clay Content, Initial Soil Matric Potential, and Wetting Rate

Charlotte Kjaergaard*,a, Lis W. de Jongeb, Per Moldrupa and Per Schjønningb

a Environmental Engineering Section, Dep. of Life Sciences, Aalborg University, Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
b Dep. of Agroecology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

* Corresponding author (C.Kjaergaard{at}agrsci.dk).

Received 3 July 2003.



    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The fraction of clay that disperses in water, water-dispersible clay (WDC), is recognized as an important property with respect to predicting soil erosion and colloid leaching. Using six mineralogically similar soils with 12, 18, 24, 28, 37, and 43% clay, we studied the influence of soil clay content, initial matric potential (IMP; {psi} = –2.5, –100, and –15500 hPa), and wetting rate on WDC released in response to infiltration of low–ionic strength rainwater, using a low-energy input measurement of WDC (LE-WDC). These results were referenced by WDC obtained by a conventional, high-energy input measurement based on air-dried soil (HE-WDC). The energy input in the dispersion procedure significantly affected the release of WDC. The amount of HE-WDC increased with clay content, while the amount of LE-WDC decreased with increasing clay content. The decrease in LE-WDC was explained by an increase in cohesive strength, reflected by the increase in water-stable aggregates (≥4 mm). A strong dependency of IMP on LE-WDC was observed, with maximum release of LE-WDC from soils that were at –2.5 hPa before measurement. Decreasing soil matric potential in the period before measurement reduced LE-WDC and also reduced the dependency of soil clay content, with soils incubated at –15500 hPa releasing a low amount of LE-WDC independent of clay content. The content of particulate organic C (POC) in the LE-WDC decreased with increasing clay content, and increased after drying to –15500 hPa. Colloid dispersibility changed as a function of time and moisture status, with the main changes occurring during or immediately after adjustment of the moisture content. Increasing the wetting rate resulted in a doubling of the amount of LE-WDC released from the initially dry soil (–15500 hPa), while no effect of wetting rate was observed at higher initial matric potentials.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • DOC, dissolved organic C • EC, electrical conductivity • HE-WDC, high-energy water-dispersible colloids • IMP, initial matric potential • LE-WDC, low-energy water-dispersible colloids • POC, particulate organic C • SAR, sodium adsorption ratio • TOC, total organic C • WDC, water-dispersible colloids • WSA, water-stable aggregates


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE ABILITY OF MOBILE soil colloids to facilitate the transport of strongly sorbing contaminants in structured soils has been widely documented (e.g., Seta and Karathanasis, 1997; de Jonge et al., 1998, 2000; Laubel et al., 1999; Karathanasis, 1999; Sprague et al., 2000; Villholth et al., 2000; Petersen et al., 2003). Despite the potential importance of this phenomenon, the available information about the intrinsic and dynamic soil properties that control colloid mobilization in structured soils is presently insufficient to predict the risk of colloid leaching. When investigating colloid mobilization in structured soils, two important issues should be considered: (i) the inherent ability of colloids to disperse from aggregates in response to infiltration of low–ionic strength rainwater, and (ii) the profound effect of pore structure on the active flow volume of the infiltrating water, affecting both in situ colloid mobilization and the subsequent transport of mobilized colloids.

In general, the main fraction of soil colloids is associated in aggregates as a result of the cohesive nature of colloids (Oades and Waters, 1991; Oades, 1993), and released following disintegration of aggregates. Le Bissonnais (1996) summarized four main mechanisms for disintegration of aggregates: (i) slaking, which is disintegration caused by the compression of entrapped air during wetting, (ii) differential swelling, (iii) mechanical breakdown by raindrop impact, and (iv) physicochemical dispersion. These processes differ in the intensity of disintegration and the size of the resulting fragments. Disintegration of aggregates by slaking and swelling results in the breakdown of larger aggregates into minor units, which consequently increases the surface area and exposes new surfaces, which may ultimately increase colloid dispersion. Dispersion is the ultimate state of breakdown that results in release of clay particles as a consequence of expanding electrical double layers and dominating repulsive forces as described by the DLVO theory (Derjaguin and Landau, 1948; Verwey and Overbeek, 1948). It is generally recognized that the fraction of clay that disperses in water has been found to have statistically significant relationships with soil erodibility (Miller and Baharuddin, 1986; Shainberg et al., 1992). The soil WDC fraction has been used as input parameter for predicting soil erosion (Brubaker et al., 1992), colloid leaching, and colloid-facilitated transport through the vadose zone (Jarvis et al., 1999; Villholth et al., 2000).

The predominant effect of clay mineralogy (e.g., Frenkel et al., 1978; Goldberg et al., 1988; Seta and Karathanasis, 1996), solution ionic strength and pH (e.g., Rengasamy, 1983; Rengasamy et al., 1984; Grolimund and Borkovec, 1999; Flury et al., 2002) on colloid dispersion has been documented from several studies. In natural field soils, the effect of mineralogy and solution ionic strength may, however, be influenced by the presence of surface adsorbed organic C, which may mask the direct importance of clay mineralogy or promote increased aggregate stability by increasing the bonding strength of aggregates or reducing the wettability and consequently the slaking potential of aggregates. From regression analysis comparing a range of soil factors, several studies have identified total clay content as one of the most important properties in determining the amount of WDC (Pojasok and Kay, 1990; Brubaker et al., 1992; Rasiah et al., 1992; Levy et al., 1993; Curtin et al., 1994). In addition, the matric potential of aggregates before measurement (e.g., Pojasok and Kay, 1990; Rasiah et al., 1992; Brubaker et al., 1992) and management in terms of crop sequence, application of organic manures, soil tillage, and field traffic (e.g., Watts et al., 1996a b; Watts and Dexter, 1997, Schjønning et al., 2002) have been shown to significantly affect dispersibility of clay in soil structural elements.

Different properties may influence WDC in different soil types, but comparison among data is complicated by the numerous methods that have been used to determine WDC. Studies have shown that values of aggregate stability and WDC depend on sample pretreatment, initial moisture content, length of time aggregates were allowed to wet up and equilibrate, and the length of the shaking period (e.g., Pojasok and Kay, 1990; Kay and Dexter, 1990). Generally, most studies have used air-dry soil for measurements of WDC. Air drying is meant to standardize initial conditions. However, air drying may introduce changes in chemical or physical characteristics that can alter stability (Alderfer, 1946; Reid and Goss, 1981). These changes are further augmented due to swelling or slaking during rewetting of the samples (Panabokke and Quirk, 1957). On the basis of these observations, Pojasok and Kay (1990) recommended that soil stability and dispersible clay should be measured using field-moist soils.

Water-dispersible colloids can be measured for different purposes, one of which is to yield an estimate of the fraction of potentially mobile colloids released during the infiltration of low–ionic strength rainwater through the soil. Clay may become mechanically dispersed at the soil surface layer by erosive raindrop impact. However, determinations of WDC with low energy inputs are probably more indicative of in situ colloid mobilization from the upper soil horizon, especially when the soil surface is protected from raindrop kinetic energy by vegetation cover. Although the most frequently applied dispersion methods involve sieved, air-dried soil and application of mechanical energy, we see a need for modified methodologies that better simulate the potential amount of WDC released from soil aggregates with different initial moisture conditions before a rain event. In this paper we explore the process of colloid dispersion with the following objectives: (i) evaluating the results from a low-energy input measurement of WDC against a conventional, high-energy input measurement based on air-dry soil, and (ii) using the low-energy input WDC measurement to determine the influence of soil clay content, initial soil matric potential, and wetting rate on colloid dispersion following infiltration of low–ionic strength rainwater. The soils used in these studies were collected from six locations along a naturally occurring clay gradient from an arable field (Lerbjerg, Denmark) with clay contents ranging from 12 to 43%. The use of soil with similar mineralogy and management history allows examination of the interacting effects of soil clay content and initial soil matric potential on colloid dispersion.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Field Site and Soil Characteristics
Soil samples were collected in the early spring of 2000 from 1-m2 areas at the 10- to 18-cm depth at six sites along a naturally occurring clay gradient (Fig. 1) of an arable field in Lerbjerg, Denmark (56°22'N, 9°59'E). The soil is developed on push morainic deposits from the Weichselian Glacial Age, and the site has been under conventionally tilled winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for several years. The mineralogy of the site was found typical for intermediately weathered, well-drained soils under cold climate conditions (Schjønning et al., 1999). Primary minerals quartz, micas, and feldspars dominated the sand and silt fractions, while the clay fraction was dominated by secondary minerals illite (20–30%), smectite—predominantly montmorillonite—(10–30%), and vermiculite (10–20%).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of the sampling area at Lerbjerg with contours of soil clay content. The designations L1 to L6 refer to sampling locations.

 
To avoid disturbing the soil structure, samples were carefully excavated as intact cubes (650 cm3) and placed in plastic boxes with pieces of polystyrene placed above and below to support the soil (see Fig. 1 of Schjønning et al., 2002). The intact soil cubes were stored at 2°C under field-moist conditions (water content close to field capacity, about –100 hPa). A part of the soil samples was air dried, sieved at 2 mm, and used for analysis of soil properties (Table 1). Soil texture was determined using a combination of wet sieving and the hydrometer method. Total C was determined on a Leco (St. Joseph, MI) Carbon Analyzer coupled to an infrared CO2 detector. Soil pH was determined in 0.01 M CaCl2 with a 1:2.5 (w/w) soil/electrolyte suspension. The content of calcite was measured gas volumetrically. Exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity (CEC) on these soils was determined by Schjønning et al. (1999) as the NH4+ equivalents found in the leachate following saturation with NH4+ (NH4OAc, pH 7) (Kalra and Maynard, 1991). Sodium-adsorption ratios (SAR) were calculated from the concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Na+ in the leachate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Basic characteristics of Lerbjerg soils.

 
Water-Dispersible Colloids
Water-dispersible colloids were measured by applying either a high- or a low-energy input in the dispersion procedure. The HE-WDC measurement resembled the conventionally used procedures for estimating dispersible colloids based on air-dry soil and mechanical shaking of the soil–water suspension. Pretreatment of the six soil types before measurement involved air drying and sieving bulk soil samples at 2 mm. The dispersion procedure involved direct immersion of the soil samples in an electrolyte solution having a chemical composition identical to natural rain-water (electrical conductivity [EC] = 0.025 mS cm–1 and SAR = 0.736), and mechanical shaking at a 1:8 (w/w) soil/water ratio for 16 h on a reciprocal shaker at 29 rpm and 0.5-m diameter rotation. After mechanical dispersion the ≤2-µm fraction was separated by siphoning off the upper suspension in one-step gravity sedimentation. The amount of HE-WDC in the retrieved suspension was measured as mass dry weight. Measurements of HE-WDC were performed in triplicate.

The pretreatment procedures of the six soil types subjected to low-energy input dispersion measurements are illustrated in Fig. 2 . The pretreatment included (i) saturation by capillary wetting and drainage to three initial soil matric potentials {psi} = –2.5, –100, and –15500 hPa, which covered the moisture conditions from near saturation to the crop wilting point, and (ii) resaturation with either slow wetting with controlled tension for 7 d or fast wetting within 4 h. The experiments were performed using three replicates of each combination, giving a total of 108 samples. The pretreatment involved the following procedure. Field-moist soil, with known soil water content, was passed through an 8-mm sieve and packed in 100-cm3 steel cylinders at a bulk density of 1.1 Mg m–3. Care was taken not to press the soil through the sieve. Aggregates were separated by hand at the planes of weakness until they obtained a size that allowed them to pass the sieve. The packed samples were sealed at the bottom with a 0.45-µm nylon disc filter.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Pretreatment procedures for measurement of low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) as a function of initial matric potential (IMP) and wetting rate.

 
Initially the packed soils were saturated with electrolyte solution by slow capillary wetting on tension tables with a slowly increasing potential from –100 to 0 hPa during 6 d, and finally allowed to equilibrate for 48 h. After initial saturation, one-third of the samples were drained to –2.5 hPa and two-thirds were drained to –100 hPa on tension tables. Samples were allowed to equilibrate for 1 wk. Half of the samples drained to –100 hPa were subsequently dried by passing through dry air until the samples reached a gravimetric water content corresponding to a soil matric potential at –15500 hPa. The water content of –15500 hPa was estimated using water retention data from Schjønning et al. (1999).

After drainage all samples were weighed, sealed, and allowed to equilibrate for 14 d at 10°C. Water loss at –2.5 hPa was prevented by incubating the samples in containers with a water saturated atmosphere, and water gain at –15500 hPa was prevented by incubating the samples in containers with silica gel. After the 14-d incubation period the samples were reweighed. Water loss or gain was found to be insignificant. The packed soil samples were then placed on tension tables and resaturated with electrolyte solution. Samples incubated at –2.5 hPa were initially drained to –100 hPa and subsequently saturated. This procedure was done to have identical treatments with respect to changes in electrolyte composition for all samples. Half of the treatments were saturated by slow capillary wetting from an initial soil matric potential at –100 hPa with slowly increasing potential for 7 d, and the other half by fast capillary wetting within 4 h. The volume change after slow and fast wetting was measured with a specially constructed caliper.

Immediately after the resaturation, the samples were transferred quantitatively to 1-L polyethylene sedimentation bottles with electrolyte solution and further electrolyte solution was added to reach a final soil/water ratio of 1:8. The dispersion procedure for the LE-WDC measurement involved turning the soil suspension upside down manually 10 times. Also in this case, the colloid fraction (≤2-µm) was separated by one-step gravity sedimentation. The amount of LE-WDC after one-step gravity sedimentation was measured as mass dry weight. Stock suspensions from each soil were used for making turbidity calibration curves for determination of colloid concentration in later experiments. Fractions of LE-WDC released after slow rewetting (Fig. 2) were used for the following experimental investigations: (i) comparison of HE-WDC with LE-WDC, (ii) evaluating the effect of initial matric potential, (iii) investigating the time dependency of colloid dispersion, and finally (iv) investigating the effect of wetting rate by comparing with fractions of LE-WDC released after fast rewetting.

Characterization of Colloid Suspensions
The LE-WDC suspensions were characterized for total organic C (TOC), particulate organic C (POC), and dissolved organic C (DOC). Total organic C was measured by C combustion using a Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC-5000A, Shimadzu Scientific, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a suspended particle kit and coupled to an auto sampler with magnetic stirring. Dissolved organic C was determined on colloid suspensions after centrifuging for 1 h at 4180 g, yielding a size separation at approximately 50 nm, assuming spherical particles with 2.63 g cm–3 density. This separates the fraction of organic matter bound to the mineral fraction (mineral bound POC) from the DOC. Particulate organic C is given as POC = TOC – DOC. The results were used for calculating the POC/LE-WDC ratio.

Dispersion Kinetics
The time dependency of colloid dispersion was investigated using the same experimental setup as described for the low-energy input dispersion measurement. Low-energy water-dispersible colloids were measured at 11.5% clay with three initial soil matric potentials ({psi} = –2.5, –100, and –15500 hPa) and five times (0, 12, 26, 72, and 145 h). Initially all samples were saturated with electrolyte solution by slow capillary infiltration on tension tables and allowed to equilibrate for 48 h. After initial saturation, one-third of the samples were drained to –2.5 hPa, and two-thirds were drained during 24 h to –100 hPa on tension tables. Half of the samples drained to –100 hPa were subsequently dried by passing them through dry air for 6 h until the samples reached a gravimetric water content corresponding to a soil matric potential of –15500 hPa. Immediately after reaching the desired soil matric potentials, LE-WDC was measured at time 0. The rest of the samples were capped and stored at 2°C, and samples were taken for LE-WDC measurements after 12, 26, 72, and 145 h.

Wet Aggregate Stability
Approximately 50 g of field-moist soil was taken from three intact soil cubes for determination of water-stable aggregates (WSA) by methods as described by Pojasok and Kay (1990). The soil was gently passed through an 8-mm sieve. A subsample of 10 g was used for determining water content, and 30 g were taken to a 4-mm sieve installed in a wet-sieving apparatus (Yoder, 1936). Thirty seconds of initial capillary wetting were followed by 2 min of vertical movement of the sieve (stroke length 32 mm, 38 strokes min–1). The water used for the wet-sieving procedure was identical to the electrolyte solution used for the HE-WDC and LE-WDC measurements. Stable aggregates remaining on the sieves (≥0.250 and ≥4 mm) were transferred quantitatively to a beaker. Water was evaporated at 80°C, and the soil was further dried at 105°C followed by weighing. Finally the soil was dispersed by end-over-end shaking for 24 h with a 0.002 M Na4P2O7 solution and poured through the 0.250- and 4-mm sieves. Primary particles ≥0.250 and ≥4 mm were weighed following drying at 105°C. Results are given as percentage of WSA.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Caveats in Interpreting Water-Dispersible Colloids
The quantification of dispersible clay in this study was based on suspensions derived from one-step gravity sedimentation. This inevitably will underestimate the clay dispersed from the sample. A total recovery of dispersed clay would require repeated sedimentations. This would, however, induce extra dispersion of clay. Christensen (1985) examined the relative amount of dispersed clay retrieved by repeated sedimentations for a sandy loam soil. For that soil, it appeared that approximately 86% of total clay in suspension was retrieved in the first sedimentation. This deviation from full recovery will depend on soil type because of differences among soils in the particle size distribution of clay particles. Hence, in this study we obviously did not recover all dispersed clay and we also anticipate some difference in the degree of recovery among the six soils. However, we consider this error not to compromise the issues addressed.

The fact that all six soil types were sampled along a texture gradient within one single field is important in ruling out management-induced differences in clay dispersibility. Several investigations have shown that management may affect clay dispersibility (e.g., Watts et al., 1996ab; Watts and Dexter, 1997). As the six soils used for this study have experienced the same management in all respects, we consider them similar for the study. We cannot exclude some difference in the energy the soils have received during tillage, the soils holding more clay being cloddier and less friable than the less clayey soils. This would be expected also to influence clay dispersibility (Watts et al., 1996a; Schjønning et al., 2002). However, such effects would still be minor compared with soils sampled at different locations.

High- vs. Low-Energy Input Dispersible Colloids
Mechanically dispersible colloids obtained by the classical, HE-WDC procedure increased with increasing clay content from 1458 mg kg–1 at 11.5% clay to 5989 mg kg–1 at 28% clay, followed by an insignificant increase to 6283 mg kg–1 at 43% clay (Fig. 3a) . The positive correlation between HE-WDC and total clay agrees with observations from other studies having different pretreatments but all involving mechanical shaking in the measuring procedure (Table 2). The application of mechanical energy breaks down the aggregates and thereby increases the surface area. As a consequence, more clay is dispersed as the soil content of clay increases. The maximum HE-WDC at 28% clay could be explained by the following:



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Amount of (a) high-energy water-dispersible colloids (HE-WDC) as a function of clay content, and (b) low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) as a function of clay content and initial matric potential (IMP). Error bars: ±SE.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Methods used for measuring water-dispersible colloids (WDC) as a function of total clay content.

 
Other studies have found both linear correlations (Brubaker et al., 1992) and logarithmic relations (Levy et al., 1993) between WDC and total clay, and these inconsistencies may be a possible consequence of differences in the input of mechanical energy in the dispersion procedure (Table 2).

The employment of a low-energy input in the dispersion procedure displayed an opposite trend of a decreasing amount of LE-WDC with increasing clay content (Fig. 3b). These results also revealed a strong dependency of initial soil matric potential, and an interactive effect between clay content and initial soil matric potential on LE-WDC. For soils incubated at high water content (–2.5 hPa), LE-WDC decreased from 3174 mg kg–1 at 11.5% clay to 1247 mg kg–1 at 43% clay. The same pattern was observed for soils incubated at intermediate water content (–100 hPa), but the amount of LE-WDC was reduced, with LE-WDC decreasing from 1974 mg kg–1 at 11.5% clay to 1025 mg kg–1 at 43% clay. The L4 soil (28% clay) in both cases showed a considerably lower dispersibility than the other clay-rich soils. The reason for this lower dispersibility is not clear, but it could be due to differences among soils in the content of strongly bonding agents such as sesquioxides. Soils incubated at very low water content (–15500 hPa) released a small amount of LE-WDC, about 450 to 500 mg kg–1, which was independent of clay content.

The decrease in LE-WDC with increasing clay content can be explained by a combination of two interrelated properties: (i) increasing cohesive strength between clay particles due to the larger number of clay particles increasing the area of contact, and (ii) a higher ionic strength in the pore water of aggregates from the higher clay soils, as indicated by the increase in CEC with increasing clay content (Table 1). In addition, it is also evidenced from the ratio of POC to LE-WDC (Table 3) that the composition of the colloid fraction differs, with a decrease in the content of POC as the clay content increases. This is probably a consequence of the lower TOC/clay ratio with increasing clay content (Table 1) and may indicate that organic C associated with mineral colloids may increase the dispersibility of colloids. The influence of organic matter on aggregate stability and clay dispersion has been the subject of much discussion, since it has been found that organic matter may promote both aggregation and dispersion (e.g., Shanmuganathan and Oades, 1983; Durgin and Chaney, 1984; Barzegar et al., 1997). The stabilizing effect of soil organic matter has been attributed to the role that roots and hyphae have in stabilizing macroaggregates, thereby preventing clay dispersion. When these bonds are broken by aggregate disruption, the dispersive effects of organic matter may predominate (e.g., Goldberg et al., 1990; Nelson et al., 1998).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Ratio of particulate organic carbon (POC) to low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) from LE-WDC having different initial matric potential (IMP).

 
The increase in the amount of WSA with increasing clay content clearly indicates that the decrease in LE-WDC is related to an increase in aggregate stability (Fig. 4) . Two size fractions of WSA (≥0.250 and ≥4 mm) are correlated with the clay content. The fraction ≥0.250 mm represents the traditionally used size discrimination between micro- and macroaggregates (Tisdall and Oades, 1982), and the fraction ≥4 mm was chosen based on experiences from preliminary investigations. The fraction of WSA ≥ 0.250 mm showed a significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.827; P < 0.05) between the percentage of WSA and clay content, with the soil mass increasing from 51% at 11.5% clay to 74% at 43% clay. Using the fraction of WSA ≥ 4 mm significantly improved the correlation (R2 = 0.989; P < 0.001) between the percentage of WSA and clay content, with a soil mass ranging from 26% at 11.5% clay to 61% at 43% clay. This demonstrated that the increase in clay content from 11.5 to 43% resulted in a minor increase in the total percentage of stable macroaggregates ≥0.250 mm, while the increase in aggregate stability with increasing clay content is mainly explained by the fraction of very large WSA (≥4 mm). The positive correlation between clay content and WSA has been reported in several studies (e.g., Kemper et al., 1987; Pojasok and Kay, 1990). It may be speculated that estimates of WSA could be used to predict WDC. However, the results from this study showed that a poor correlation existed between LE-WDC and WSA (Fig. 5) . At lower clay content (<25%), the amount of LE-WDC increased as WSA decreased, while at higher clay content (≥28%), no correlation existed between LE-WDC and WSA. Water-stable aggregates continued to increase with increasing clay content, while LE-WDC maintained a constant minimum value. Generally, attempts to use aggregate stability to predict soil susceptibility to erosion have had limited success due to conflicting results (Amezketa et al., 1996). The differences in HE-WDC and LE-WDC displayed from this study agree with the conclusions of Kay and Dexter (1990), who documented that the amount of mechanically dispersed clay increased with increasing aggregate size, while the amount of spontaneously dispersed clay increased with increasing surface area, which required initial aggregate breakdown. This highlights the importance in the choice of dispersion procedure, especially the input of energy. When using estimates of WDC as input parameter for modeling colloid mobilization and transport, one should be aware of the coherence between energy input and the result of the WDC measurement. The application of mechanical energy by the shaking procedure may resemble "worst case" scenarios, where storm flow events or soil tillage increases dispersion by breaking down aggregates, while the use of low-energy input dispersion measurements may resemble the in situ release of colloids from the upper horizons during average precipitation events.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Percentage of water-stable aggregates (WSA) in fractions >0.25 and >4 mm as a function of clay content. Error bars: ±SE.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Regression plot between water-stable aggregates (WSA) and low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) at IMP –2.5 hPa. Error bars: ±SE.

 
Effect of Initial Soil Matric Potential on Low-Energy Water-Dispersible Colloids
Two properties should be considered when interpreting the decrease in the amount of LE-WDC resulting from the decrease in soil water content following drainage and drying: (i) the dependency between soil water content and separation distance of colloids, and (ii) the role of ionic strength. Drainage and drying may increase interparticle bonding or cementation of colloids due to a closer distance approach of colloids following a decrease in soil-water content. In addition, drying may increase the ionic strength of the resident soil water, thereby increasing the interparticle bonding. In this experiment, the soils incubated at –2.5 hPa were actually drained on tension tables to –100 hPa before resaturation (Fig. 2). This means that soils incubated at –2.5 and –100 hPa have received the same treatment with respect to changes in ionic strength. This indicates that the effect of initial matric potential reflects the soil water content, where a greater resistance against dispersion would be expected when a decreasing soil water content increases the surface contacts of colloids. This was clearly reflected in the reduction in LE-WDC from soils at –100 hPa, which was still observable even after 1 wk of complete rewetting. Regarding the soils incubated at –15500 hPa, these soils were also initially drained to –100 hPa on tension tables, and then additionally dried by passing through dry air. Since the drying procedure does not result in leaching of ions, the ionic strength of the resident soil water will increase as the soil water content decreases and this will add to the stronger interparticle bonding or cementation of colloids following drying. When drying is severe, as in the –15500 hPa treatment, the colloids seemed to be able to maintain this strong bonding even after 1 wk of complete rewetting. An investigation of the colloid fractions showed that a much higher POC/LE-WDC ratio was observed in colloid fractions released after drying to –15500 hPa (Table 3). This may be a consequence of microbial death and lysis of microbial cells (Christ and David, 1994, 1996a, 1996b), increasing the fraction of mineral bound organic C, and/or it may indicate that mineral colloids with surface coatings of organic C are more easily dispersed as a result of lower bonding strength among these colloids.

It is interesting that no effect of clay content on LE-WDC was evident after drying to –15500 hPa. Kemper and Rosenau (1984) found greater cohesion in 40% clay than in 15% clay after air drying. The reason that no effect of clay content is evident from this study might be that the cohesive forces created during the drying of low-clay soils were sufficient to withstand dispersion under the mild stresses applied by the low-energy input. It is important to note that the effect of initial soil matric potential declines with increasing clay content. This is probably a consequence of pores <30 µm constituting an increasing fraction of the pore volume with increasing clay content as documented for this clay gradient by Kjaergaard et al. (2004). These pores will retain water after drainage to –100 hPa, while only pores ≥30 µm will drain, and this consequently minimizes the effect of soil matric potential on colloid dispersion at higher clay contents.

Time Dependency of Colloid Dispersion
In the field, soil is subjected to drying and wetting events that continuously change the moisture status of the soil, and thus the dispersibility, as illustrated previously. This raises the important question of the time dependency of the dispersion process. This was investigated as a function of soil matric potential at 11.5% clay, since the effect of soil matric potential was most pronounced at this clay content. The results revealed that colloid dispersion changed as a function of time and that the rate of change depended on the moisture status of the soil (Fig. 6) . When the moisture content was near saturation (–2.5 hPa), LE-WDC increased with time from 1636 mg kg–1 at time 0 to 3046 mg kg–1 after 26 h, when the rate of change leveled off, with only a minor increase to 3091 mg kg–1 after 145 h. Additionally, 24 h drainage of soils to –100 hPa immediately reduced LE-WDC to 1455 mg kg–1, followed by a continuing small decrease in LE-WDC during the incubation period to 1333 mg kg–1 after 166 h, with a rate of decreasing dispersibility of 0.859 mg kg–1 h–1. An additional 6 h of air drying to –15500 hPa resulted in an immediate reduction in LE-WDC to 409 mg kg–1, followed by a continuing small decrease in LE-WDC during the incubation to 303 mg kg–1 after 172 h, with a rate of decreasing dispersibility of 0.747 mg kg–1 h–1. At this clay content, the main change in dispersibility appeared to occur during or immediately after adjustment of the moisture status. The increase in dispersibility at –2.5 hPa occurred within the first 26 h, and the decrease in dispersibility at –100 and –15500 hPa occurred primarily during the change in moisture status. However, the dispersibility at –100 and –15500 hPa continued to decrease with time. This is consistent with the results of Kemper and Rosenau (1984), who found an increase in cohesive strength with duration of storage and suggested that the increase in cohesion under air-dry conditions indicates that migration of bonding components continue even when there is as little as one molecular layer of water on the mineral surfaces.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Amount of low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) as a function of time and initial matric potential (IMP) at 11.5% clay. Error bars: ±SE.

 
Effect of Wetting Rate on Low-Energy Water-Dispersible Colloids
Drying and successive wetting can also cause a decrease in strength. When dry aggregates are wetted, their breakdown can result from the effect of entrapped air and differential swelling (Grant and Dexter, 1989). In this study, the sensitivity of LE-WDC released due to slaking and swelling was examined by comparing LE-WDC released after slow and fast rewetting. The volume change after fast wetting showed that soils incubated at –2.5 or –100 hPa experienced no or only very small volume changes after fast wetting, while for soils incubated at –15500 hPa the volume increased from 10 x 10–6 m3 m–3 at 11.5% clay to 90 x 10–6 m3 m–3 at 43% clay (Fig. 7a) . The application of water during wetting of the –15500 hPa soils ranged from 33 x 10–6 to 41 x 10–6 m3 m–3, which indicated that a considerable part of the volume change at >24% clay was a consequence of swelling and/or slaking. An examination of the resultant release of LE-WDC as a consequence of fast wetting showed no significant effect of wetting rate on LE-WDC released from soils incubated at –2.5 and –100 hPa (results not shown). In contrast, for soils incubated at –15500 hPa, the amount of LE-WDC released after fast wetting almost doubled compared with the amount of LE-WDC released after slow wetting. At both wetting rates no effect of clay content was observed (Fig. 7b). The reason for fast wetting only affecting colloid dispersion for the initially dry soils is probably because slaking decreases as the initial water content increases until saturation is reached (Panabokke and Quirk, 1957). This is a consequence of the reduction of the volume of air that is entrapped during wetting and also the reduction of soil matric potential gradients. In addition, the capillary wetting probably resulted in some escape of air, which would minimize the effect of wetting rate compared with a situation with downward infiltration. The lack of a clay effect on colloid dispersion after fast wetting may be a consequence of the counteracting effect of swelling and slaking with increasing clay content. According to Le Bissonnais (1996), aggregate breakdown by slaking decreases when clay content increases in the range of 10 to 30%. In contrast to slaking, aggregate breakdown by differential swelling increases with increasing clay content, which indicates that the increase in volume with increasing clay content (Fig. 7a) may be partly a consequence of swelling. The results obtained from these soils indicate that the quantitative effect of wetting rate on colloid release, as a consequence of slaking and swelling, is of minor importance, since it only increases LE-WDC from dry soils with initially low dispersibility. However, it is important to be aware that the effect of slaking depends on the pore system of the soil aggregates, which in turn depends on the associations of particles. Results have shown that the air-filled porosity in aggregates varies according to the type of clay, with aggregates dominated by kaolinite and illite having a higher air-filled porosity than aggregates dominated by smectite (Tessier et al., 1990). Tessier et al. (1990) investigated the influence of wetting on microstructural changes of kaolinite, illite, and smectite. In aggregates dominated by smectite the pores were mainly isolated due to the parallel association of the flexible sheets. The hydraulic conductivity was consequently low and the aggregates were able to maintain their cohesion even after complete rehydration. In contrast, the wetting rate was very rapid for kaolinite and illite, and entrapment of air resulted in aggregate breakdown by slaking. In general, aggregate breakdown by slaking is most important in aggregations with large blocky particles because of the larger pore size. The importance of slaking in the process of colloid dispersion therefore depends on the mineralogy of the soil, with the soils used in this study probably being more resistant to slaking than soils with a higher content of kaolinite and illite.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of wetting rate on (a) volume change after fast infiltration as a function of clay content and initial matric potential (IMP), and (b) amount of low-energy water-dispersible colloids (LE-WDC) at –15500 hPa as a function of clay content.

 

    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The results of our study revealed that measurements of WDC were extremely sensitive to pretreatment (moisture status) and energy input in the dispersion procedure, which highlights the importance of identifying the methods for measurements of WDC that resemble the relevant conditions when predicting the affinity of soils to colloid dispersion. In contrast to most previous studies in which researchers observed positive correlations between clay content and mechanically dispersible colloids, we found that by applying a low-energy input, better resembling a situation of water infiltration through the soil, less colloids were released with increasing clay content as a consequence of increased aggregate stability.

This study also documented that there is no unique relation between WDC and clay content, as WDC significantly depended not only on the energy input but also on the initial conditions of the soils. This was reflected both by the pronounced effect of initial matric potential and by the interacting effect of initial matric potential and wetting rate on LE-WDC. On the basis of the sensitivity of the LE-WDC toward initial matric potential as well as wetting rate, we also anticipate that the use of the low-energy dispersion procedure would result in measurements of WDC that would be much more sensitive toward other important soil factors such as mineralogy, chemistry, management conditions, and the interactions among these properties, compared with the classical estimates of WDC. We therefore recommend that estimates of WDC to be used in predictive models should not be based on empirical relationships, but need to be measured using methods that resemble the conditions of interest.

Future studies intended to investigate the potential of colloid dispersion from aggregates should consider the importance of these different mechanisms of aggregate breakdown and colloid release. The results from this study additionally highlight the general problems of using air-dry or dried soils when investigating colloid mobilization and transport. Clearly the effect of initial matric potential should be taken into consideration when studying colloid mobilization. In addition, the time dynamics and reversibility of changing moisture conditions on colloid dispersibility should be explored further.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was funded by The European Doctoral School at Aalborg University, and the Danish FREJA-program (Female Researchers in Joint Action) under the Danish Research Council. The authors thank farmer Lars Jørgen Pedersen, Lerbjerg, Denmark, for giving us access to his field. The technical assistance of Stig T. Rasmussen and Palle Jørgensen is gratefully acknowledged.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
J. Siemens, K. Ilg, H. Pagel, and M. Kaupenjohann
Is Colloid-Facilitated Phosphorus Leaching Triggered by Phosphorus Accumulation in Sandy Soils?
J. Environ. Qual., October 23, 2008; 37(6): 2100 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. Klitzke and F. Lang
Hydrophobicity of Soil Colloids and Heavy Metal Mobilization: Effects of Drying
J. Environ. Qual., June 27, 2007; 36(4): 1187 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
T. G. Poulsen, P. Moldrup, L. W. de Jonge, and T. Komatsu
Colloid and Bromide Transport in Undisturbed Soil Columns: Application of Two-Region Model
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
K. Schelde, L. W. de Jonge, C. Kjaergaard, M. Laegdsmand, and G. H. Rubaek
Effects of Manure Application and Plowing on Transport of Colloids and Phosphorus to Tile Drains
Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 445 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Kjaergaard, H. C. B. Hansen, C. B. Koch, and K. G. Villholth
Properties of Water-Dispersible Colloids from Macropore Deposits and Bulk Horizons of an Agrudalf
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1844 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
L. W. de Jonge, C. Kjaergaard, and P. Moldrup
Colloids and Colloid-Facilitated Transport of Contaminants in Soils: An Introduction
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 321 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. F. McCarthy and L. D. McKay
Colloid Transport in the Subsurface: Past, Present, and Future Challenges
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 326 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
N. M. DeNovio, J. E. Saiers, and J. N. Ryan
Colloid Movement in Unsaturated Porous Media: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 338 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
C. Kjaergaard, T. G. Poulsen, P. Moldrup, and L. W. de Jonge
Colloid Mobilization and Transport in Undisturbed Soil Columns. I. Pore Structure Characterization and Tritium Transport
Vadose Zone J., May 1, 2004; 3(2): 413 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone J